My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01350
CWCB
>
Chatfield Mitigation
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01350
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:00:49 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:53:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
1/24/2006
Description
WSP Section - Colorado River Issues - Development of Opearations for Lakes Powell and Mead under Low Reservoir Conditions, including the Development of Lower Basin Shortage Criteria
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />December 12, 2005 <br />Page 12 of 15 <br />Working Draft for Discussion <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Mainstream Water Conserved by Extraordinary Conservation <br />Measures <br /> <br />Description <br />If a state provides for the temporary reduction of its basic apportionment <br />under the Boulder Canyon Project Act by extraordinary measures (after <br />deducting any payback of2001 and 2002 overruns and inadvertent <br />overruns associated with the IOPP), such as water system efficiency <br />projects, on-farm conservation, and fallowing agricultural land previously <br />irrigated, the reduction in consumptive use would be a credit applied <br />toward future use ofICS. [The methods of extraordinary conservation in <br />addition to fallowing are to be determined (e.g. canal lining and tailwater <br />return systems).] <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Conditions <br />1. The permission to use ICS is limited to credits available after a <br />reduction for the previous years' evaporation losses and the reduction <br />to benefit the system. The benefit to the system should be no greater <br />than 5% [still to be determined]. <br /> <br />2. The total amount ofICS would be limited. [This limit is still to be <br />determined.] The ICS may be transferred to another entity in the same <br />state. <br /> <br />3. The permission to use ICS would be suspended during a shortage, but <br />would be reinstated after the Lake Mead condition returns to normal as <br />long as credits for use ofICS are still available. <br /> <br />4. If Flood Control or Quantified Surplus is available in any year, the <br />permission to accumulate ICS credits would be suspended for that <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />12 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.