Laserfiche WebLink
<br />-' <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />!. <br /> <br />STATE OF COLOAADO <br />~. <br />~ <br /> <br />Colorado Water Conservation Board <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />ill Centennial Building <br />, 31 3 Sherman Street <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (303) 866.3441 <br />FA)(: (303) 866-4474 <br />DATE: <br /> <br />Roy Romer <br />GovernQI <br /> <br />Jilmes S.lochhetld <br />Executive Director, DNR <br /> <br />Daries C. Lile. PE. <br />Director, CWCB <br /> <br />January 20, 1998 <br /> <br />TO: <br /> <br />Colorado Water Conservation Board Members <br /> <br />Peter Evans QeA<.v € A- L <br /> <br />FROM: <br /> <br />RE: <br /> <br />January 28-29, 1998 Board Meeting, Agenda Item 15, <br />Strategic Water Planning <br /> <br />Last March, you had an informal workshop to review the Long Term Financial <br />Projection for the CWCB Construction Fund and to review potential uses of the <br />Severance Tax Perpetual Base Account and Severance Tax Operational Account. At the <br />conclusion of that workshop, you indicated a relatively high degree of satisfaction with <br />the efforts made by our staffto identify and collect information concerning the needs for <br />as many potentially feasible water resource projects as possible. However, you also <br />indicated a desire that we initiate a series of regional meetings around the state to gather <br />further information and to identify any important regional differences in future water <br />resource needs which the CWCB should take into consideration. <br /> <br />Since that workshop, we have prepared preliminary plans and attempted to initiate <br />that sequence of regional meetings in July, September, November, and again at the <br />beginning of 1998. During these efforts, we also began to prepare for the 1998 review of <br />the Board's Long Range Plan (last revised in 1995), thinking that these meetings also <br />present a good opportunity to quickly review the existing Long Range Plan and ask for <br />suggested improvements. However, as we have scrambled with cope with Chuck Lile's <br />absence, the Romer-Schoettler discussions concerning the proposed Animas-La Plata <br />Project, the Section 7 Consultation for the 15 Mile Reach, the statewide assessment of <br />floodplain management needs, the Metropolitan Water Supply and Denver Basin Aquifer <br />investigations, the funding for declining aquatic species programs, the mitigation of flood <br />damages in 13 counties, the initiation of a decision support system for the Rio Grande, <br />the Interim Water Committee activities and the many other programmatic <br />responsibilities, we have not been successful in getting the proposed meeting process <br />started. <br /> <br />Based upon this frustrating experience and discussions among the workgroup <br />organized by the Colorado Farm Bureau to follow up on its January 1997 "Colorado <br />Water Development Study," I would like to propose an alternate course of action. I have <br />discussed this alternative with Jim Lochhead and with the Senior Staff and they are <br />inclined to support this alternative. <br /> <br />A copy of the proposal developed by the Farm Bureau workgroup is attached for <br />. your review. In essence, it proposes that the CWCB initiate a series of "stakeholder <br />