BOARD01326

• Board Meeting Date: 12/13/1967
• Description: Agenda or Table of Contents, Minutes, Memos
• Board Meetings - Doc Type: Meeting

I

I

MR. SPARKS:

MR. S. MILLER:

MR. STAPLETON:

MR. S. MILLER:

MR. STAPLETON:

MR. SMITH:

MR. STAPLETON:

MR. SMITH:

MR. STAPLETON:

MR. SMITH:

MR. STAPLETON:

streets and areas and sa f'Orth in the flo'Od
plain designations with n'O designation of
impr'Ovements. Am I c'Orrect in that?"

"We have some here. We can pass them
ar'Ound and show y'Ou' haw th13Y are prepared."

"This is a sample of it. It just indicates
the area 'Of impr'Ovement."

"But it doesn't indicate improvements?"

"No, 'Outside of shewing h'Ouses and sa on."

"Then my next questi'On is, haw many h'Omes
w'Ould presumably have t'O be condemned that
were in the fl'Oad plain areas as they are
designated here?"

"Their z'Oning d'Oes not provide for any
condemnati'On as such in any zaning area. Any
facility that is existing at the time 'Of adap-
tion of a zoning regulatien is allowed to
cantinue within that area."

"A nan-can forming use, is that it?"

"They can became a nen-c'Onferming use."

"Then after a period 'Of time, ten 'Or fifteen
years, it has to be renewed as a nen-conforming
use, at least that I s the law in Denver."

"Yes. Same 'Of the local regulati'Ons do
have a peri'Od in which the use can be non-
con farming , generally tied to some depreciation
value of the facility."

"Da I then understand, Larry. that by pass-
ing this res'Olutian we are net saying that
anything has t'O be non-canforming that is in
any 'Of these fl'O'Od plains? These are pr'Operty
rights vested - the Public Service Cempany
may have property down there, 'Others may have.
I d'On't want to get this Board in the position