My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01323
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01323
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:00:24 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:53:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
7/11/1978
Description
Agenda, Minutes, Resolution
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
104
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />communities of Erie and Superior, are caught in between <br />one side and the Denver metropolitan area on the other. <br />obviously ripe for expansion, and the area is expanding <br /> <br />Boulder on <br />They are <br />very rapidly. <br /> <br />Looking at the land use pattern, what Louisville and Lafayette, par- <br />ticularly, had planned to take into the city eventually, we allocated I <br />that water supply. We said, "If that,agricultural land is coming in, <br />the water must come with it." Therefore, whatever land was included <br />in the master plan, we said, "Whatever agricultural water is there,'it <br />must come in with the land." <br /> <br />MR. STAPLETON: Are there any other questions from members of the <br />board? (No response.) Members of the audience, do you have "any <br />questions of Larry? (No response.) If not, thank you, very much, <br />Larry Nelson. <br /> <br />MR. NELSON: Thank you. <br /> <br />MR. STAPLETON: Now, we come to the continuing discussion of the <br />proposed federal water policy. And inasmuch as Mr. Sparks has a fine <br />crystal ball, we only think 'it proper that you initiate the discussion <br />of this crystalizedmatter. <br /> <br />MR. SPARKS: The board and the audience will recall that shortly after <br />the President took office last year, he first announced a hit list, <br />which involved virtually every reclamation project in the Western <br />United States and a hundred percent of those in Colorado. Following <br />the outcry about this arbitrary action, the President decided that <br />some public hearings would be held, and he announced that he was going <br />to formulate a new water policy. A number of so-called "option papers" <br />were released and hearings were held throughout the United States on <br />those option papers. <br /> <br />Eventually, the State of Colorad6 put together its response to those <br />option papers. Subsequent to that, further meetings have been held. <br />The Colorado congressional delegation, along with others, have been <br />particularly active in this field, protesting many of the proposals in <br />the new water policy. ,Governor Lamm has taken a personal interest in <br />it and has had a number of meetings with the President and his people <br />with reference to that water policy. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The original policy was supposed to be announced last November. Because <br />of the pressure brought by Congress and the governors, the President <br />delayed that announcement. It was finally made on June 6, just last <br />month. That policy was broken into four major categories. The first <br />one was improvement of federal water resource programs. Under this <br />heading, the President proposed new criteria for the computation' of <br /> <br />-12- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.