My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01318
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01318
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:00:15 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:53:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
9/13/2005
Description
CWCB Director's Report
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
64
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />" <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Newman began his career as a college work-study student on the Arapahoe and Roosevelt National Forest <br />in Colorado. He has held numerous positions at all levels of the Forest Service, including assignments as <br />a silviculturist in Colorado, a public affairs officer in South Dakota, a district ranger in Pennsylvania and <br />a forest supervisor in Michigan. Prior to becoming the National Fire Plan coordinator in 2002, he was the <br />budget coordinator for the National Forest System in the Washington Office. Newman holds a bachelor's <br />in forest management from Colorado State University. His appointment is effective immediately. <br /> <br />Clean Water Act - Integrated Report Guidance: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has <br />released its 2006 Integrated Report Guidance for states, territories, authorized tribes, and interstate <br />commissions. It is intended to help~statesprepare and submit Clean Water Act (CW A) required reports on~ . <br />their water quality. The guidance outlines development of biennial Integrated Reports (IR) that support <br />EPA's strategy for achieving a broad-scale inventory of water quality conditions. The IR addresses water <br />quality standards attainment status of all waters, documents the availability of data and information for <br />each waterbody, identifies certain trends in water quality conditions, and provides information to <br />managers in setting priorities for future actions to protect and restore the health of the Nation's water <br />resources. The IR Guidance, a fact sheet, and highlights are posted at: <br />htto://www.epa.gov/owow/tmdI/2006IRG. For more information contact Sarah Furtak at (202) 566-1167 <br />or furtak.sarah@epa.gov. <br /> <br />U.S. Department of Ecology Names New Program Manager: In August, Ken Slattery was named as <br />the new Water Program Manager for the Washington Department of Ecology (DOE). Ken has been <br />serving as the acting manager since June I, when Joe Stohr moved to the DOE Director's Office as a <br />Special Assistant. <br /> <br />EP A Position Articulated on Clean Water Act Section 402: In an August 5th memo, EP A General <br />Counsel Ann Klee and Ben Grumbles, Assistant Administrator for Water, for the first time articulate <br />EPA's position on the "Applicability of Section 402 of the Clean Water Act to Water Transfers." The <br />memo, which is addressed to Regional Administrators, represents EP A's interpretation of whether or not <br />National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits are required for water control <br />facilities and "water transfers," defined as "any activity that conveys or connects navigable waters (as that <br />term is defined in the CW A) without subjecting the water to intervening industrial, municipal, or <br />commercial use." The memo notes that the question has arisen because activities such as trans-basin <br />transfers of water for various water supply purposes may also move pollutants from one water body to <br />another. "The Supreme Court recently addressed this issue in South Fla. Water Mgmt. Dist. v. <br />Miccosukee Tribe of Indians, 541 U.S. 95 (2004), leaving the matter umesolved." <br /> <br />Framing the issue, the memo states that the "precise legal question...is whether the movement of <br />pollutants from one navigable water to another by a water transfer is the 'addition' of a pollutant.... The <br />question touches on the delicate balance created in the statute between protection of water quality to meet <br />federal water quality goals, and the management of water quantity left by Congress in the hands of States <br />and water resource management agencies. The issue also requires consideration of how the statute divides <br />responsibility between the federal and State governments for control-ling sources of water pollution. As a <br />matter ofIong-standing practice, EP A has not issued NPDES permits for mere water transfers; nor has it <br />ever stated in any general policy or general guidance that an NPDES permit is required for such <br />transfers. " <br /> <br />It concludes, "Based on the statute as a whole, we confirm the Agency's longstanding practice and <br />conclude that Congress intended for water transfers to be subject to oversight by water resource <br />management agencies and State non-NPDES authorities, rather than the permitting program under section <br />402 of the CWA. Furthermore, the Agency intends to initiate a rulemaking process to address water <br />transfers." It adds that no "factual, case-specific inquiry" into whether a particular water transfer <br /> <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.