My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01293
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01293
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:59:46 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:52:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
5/24/1999
Description
WSP Section - Colorado River Basin Issues - Upper Colorado River Commissioner's Report
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />" <br /> <br />e;., <br />l <br /> <br />e <br />:J <br /> <br />-., <br />.. ") <br />,-, <br /> <br />a much more limited extent. If reservoir conditions continue to deteriorate, additional cuts in use <br /> <br />by CAP will be required. <br /> <br />VI. Overron Accountin2 <br />The Draft California 4.4 Plan includes a provision that allows individual entitlement <br />holders to exceed their yearly apportionment. The proposed overrun would be constrained by a <br />maximum allowable accrual and would be subject to repayment in subsequent years, The overrun <br />accounting provision is tied to the aclmini~tration of agricultural entitlements" <br />The Six States are concerned with the overrun provisions. First, as the Colorado River <br />enters into an' era of limits, the States expect the Bureau of Reclamation to strictly enforce its <br />contracts and the entitlements. In essence, within the Lower Basin, the Bureau must play the role <br />of the State Engineer and enforce current limits on diversions by water users. Secondly, the Six <br />States are leery of proposals that would allow significant diversions above the amount of water <br />allowed to a state in shortage, normal, or limited surplus years according to the proposal <br />descn'bed in this paper, It would be extremely inequitable to allow California agricultural districts <br />to overrun their diversions by 10%, which is over 300,000 acre feet, while at the same time calling <br />for the Central Arizona Project to reduce diversions by 500,000 acre feet because a shortage had <br />been declared. <br />In spite of these significant concerns, the Six States do recognize that there may be limited <br />occasions when inadvertent overruns will occur. Due to the fact that the annual entitlement of a <br />junior priority district is dependent on the actual use by a senior priority user, there'may be <br />occasions when a district will order water only to find out later that it had exceeded its contract <br />entitlement. This matter is further compounded in the Lower Basin because a state's <br />apportionment is for consumptive use rather than diversions. Until the books are reconciled to <br />calculate diversions less measured and unmeasured return flows, it may not be possible to know <br />whether or not ail overrun has occurred until the after-the-fact accounting is completed. <br />The Six States propose that a limited form of overrun accounting be instituted. It must be <br />based on the following principles: <br />1.) , Overruns must be inadvertent. <br /> <br />12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.