My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01293
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01293
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:59:46 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:52:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
5/24/1999
Description
WSP Section - Colorado River Basin Issues - Upper Colorado River Commissioner's Report
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />e~.\ <br /> <br />tt) <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />to the Six States. These parameters are consistent with and based upon the principles described in <br />the paper issued by the Six States on October ZO, 1998 titled Back!!round and Principles for <br />NeQotiation - Special Interim Criteria for Releases of Water from Lake Mead DurinQ <br />Imolementation of the California 4.4 Plan, <br /> <br />II. Consistencv with the Law of the River <br />It goes without saying that any interim operating criteria implemented to assist California ' <br />in its program to eliminate its dependence on Colorado River water above its b,asic apportionment <br />must be consistent with the Law of the River. Of particular importance in developing the interim <br />criteria will be the apportionment system decreed by the United States Supreme Court under <br />which water diverted into any of the three Lower Division States must fit within one of three <br />categories: <br />1.) The water diverted is within that state's basic apportionment. Article II(B)(1) of <br />the Decree, 374 U.S. 340 (1964). <br />2.) The water diverted is water that has been declared by the Secretary of the Interior <br />as suxplus wate! available above the 7.5 mafbaPic apportionment available to the Lower Division <br />States, It must also be recognized that, of any ilIIlount declared to be available as suxplus, only <br />50% of that amount is available to California, unless Arizona or Nevada choose not to divert and <br />use the 46% and 4% of the surplus amount that is available to those states, respectively. Article <br />II(B)(2). <br />3.) <br /> <br />The water diverted is water that was available to one of the other Lower Division <br /> <br />States in accordance with a) or b), above, but was unused by that state. Article II(B)(6). <br /> <br />m. Other policy Considerations <br />In addition to the need for the interim reservoir operating criteria to be consistent with the <br />existing Law of the River, the Six States assert that, as a matter of fairness to all Colorado River <br />Basin States, the process of developing and promulgating interim criteria shall be consistent with <br />the following principles: <br /> <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.