Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1'. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />David Harrison: <br /> <br />All: <br /> <br />David Harrison: <br /> <br />Eric Kuhn: <br /> <br />David Harrison: <br /> <br />Chuck Lile: <br /> <br />relationships between flows and rare fish habitat in the fifteen mile reach <br />that was May 1995. I spent a considerable amount of time reviewing these <br />reports and familiarizing myself with the fifteen mile reach, the hydrology <br />and channel characteristics, I also reviewed the Fish and Wildlife attempt <br />to use Peahec Simm(?) to quantify flow recommendations in the fifteen <br />mile reach and I went and found their transect sites and looked over that <br />data that they collected in 1982. So I did put a considerable amount of <br />effort into reviewing these water rights and have concluded that they are <br />reasonable and that if these water rights are..in the motion are filed for, <br />then it will help preserve the habitat to a reasonable degree. <br /> <br />OK...any further questions? To the Division of Wildlife? Thank you, <br />Rick. Are there any other matters to be questioned about the motion? <br />From the Board? Or any other comments from the public? If not, I'll <br />raise the question. All in favor, indicate by saying Aye. <br /> <br />Aye. <br /> <br />Opposed? Motion carries. Thank you all very much. <br /> <br />I want to mention one thing to the Board....on a Yampa River issue....we <br />did not, at the last board meeting, get to the Yampa River agreement <br />between the River District and the Board...there are some dates in the <br />MOU that need to be modified, and I've asked Peter to check and see if <br />we couldn't do.. notice this and do a phone conference call to do it...I <br />think our board...the River District Board has already done it...and I think <br />its important to do this before the agreement expires on January 1 st. So <br />we'll be doing that over the next month...its just a matter of getting a time <br />when we can get us all on the phone. <br /> <br />I think we need just a brief fmal statement here. A number of you have <br />thanked us for taking the time...I just to reiterate from the Board that we <br />appreciate the extensive involvement of the interested public on this, the <br />water users, various agencies and the environmental community...it has <br />been a long strange journey and we have a long, long ways to go, but I <br />really do appreciate the quality of the debate, apologize if I've gotten a <br />little out had for the time, but we've got a long ways to go yet. Chuck? <br /> <br />I would like to say that I'm particularly impressed with the fme staff work <br />that was conducted by our team that worked on this, and that I guess in <br />recognition of that staff work, and we'll put it on the record so they can't <br />get me to wriggle out of it, I would like to offer a day of administrative <br />leave to all those staff members that did this work, conditional upon.. <br /> <br />Minutes of December 13, 1995 Special eWeB Meeting <br />