My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01276
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01276
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:59:41 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:52:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
12/13/1995
Description
Agenda or Table of Contents, Minutes, Memos - Special Meeting
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
144
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />, <br /> <br />.; <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />David Harrison: <br /> <br />Patricia Wells: <br /> <br />David Harrison: <br /> <br />Chuck Lile: <br /> <br />Patricia Wells: <br /> <br />David Harrison: <br /> <br />Eric Kuhn: <br /> <br />Chuck Lile: <br /> <br />Eric Kuhn: <br /> <br />Gene Jencsok: <br /> <br />when you're filing...but at any rate, you reserve the ability to increase the <br />carveout above the additional 72,000 acre feet should hydrologic conditions <br />change over time. <br /> <br />Hydrologic conditions or availability under the compact? <br /> <br />Whatever. (inaudible conversation from audience) I really don't think it <br />needs to be in the motion, because we can always go back and change, we <br />can always file for another water right, and I don't think we ever lock <br />ourselves into never filing for anything else. But however you want to <br />describe it is fine with me. <br /> <br />It wouldn't be filing for another water right, it would be unfiling what <br />we've got. <br /> <br />Which we have total authority to do. <br /> <br />After an administrative process...which we will want to set. <br /> <br />And a judicial process and a legal(?) process. OK., that's part of your <br />motion, so something like that gets added, probably on item 3 on the <br />findings regarding modifiability. <br /> <br />I think its key there that there be more water available to the state under <br />the compacts and the state of Colorado in its sole discretion would decide <br />that, its not up to the Upper Colorado River Compact Commission. The <br />State of Colorado decides whether more water is available. <br /> <br />Because of the changing hydrologic...I don't know...are we limited under <br />changing hydrologic conditions, because I think under compact <br />conditions... <br /> <br />Well, we may want to say..more water is available to the state than the <br />3.855 million acre feet. The state determines that more water is available <br />than 3.855 million acre feet. We don't know..the reason could be <br />hydrologic, it could be something else. May be that's the way to do it. <br />I don't see what conditions you would determine that, Gene, but it seems <br />that...(tape ends, continued on tape 3) <br /> <br />(very inaudible)..Colorado River Compact makes prOVlSlon for <br />apportionment water in excess that hasn't been apportioned before. The <br />7 basin states will decide how much of this water will be reserved for the <br />Upper and Lower Basins each. <br /> <br />Minutes of December 13, 1995 Special eWeB Meeting <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.