My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01275
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01275
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:59:36 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:52:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
9/22/2003
Description
ISF Section - Request for Approval of Policy Regarding RICDs
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />2. Adverse Flood Impacts and Durability <br />The CWCB takes very seriously the flood safety aspects of RICDs, and will carefully <br />consider flood safety in reviewing whether an RICD has been proposed for an <br />appropriate stream reach. The CWCB recommends that an applicant for an RICD <br />demonstrate, through appropriate technical analyses, that the proposed boating course <br />is designed and will be (is) constructed in such a thanner as to: <br />· Adequately pass all flows up to and including the lOO-year (lCYo probablity) flood <br />flow without causing adverse impacts tp upstream, downstream or adjacent <br />property owners. Verification of "no adverse impact" can be demonstrated <br />through the USe of a CWCB approved ste..p p.--bb~ac water hydraulics model such as <br />HEC-RAS. 1,-_ w;~~:f' ~W <br />. Adequately WI and stream forces for e design life of the proposed <br />A ~ recreational facility I flows a~d including the lOO-year flood so that <br />\~'~ damage and failure of the course; is avoided.2 Several people suggested <br />removing this bullet <br /> <br />3. Liability <br />The CWCB assumes no responsibility for use orimisuse of the boating course and is not <br />subject to liability for injuries or damages ca~sed therefrom. CWCB approval of or <br />recommendation to endorse an applicant's proposed RICD water right in no way implies <br /> <br />1 As required by current federal regulations and state 'floodplain management rules (not new guidance <br />developed for the purposes of this document), the applicant is advised that the proposed boating fClcility <br />must be analyzed for flood impacts by modeling the "eXIsting conditions" (pre-facility) scenario and the <br />"proposed conditions" (with-facility) scenario. "The hydrdulic computer modeling must be performed by a <br />registered Professional Engineer (Colorado Registration) having expertise in surface water hydraulic <br />modeling. Impacts that should be analyzed include increqses in water surface elevations for the range of <br />flows experienced at the proposed recreational facility, but especially the lOO-year flood event. <br />According to federal regulations, water surface elevations at the proposed RICD facility may not increase <br />at all (zero rise) in the event that the proposed recreational facility is within a stream reach having a <br />deSignated Floodway (the most hazClrdous portion within the lOO-year floodplain). For reaches thClt are <br />not within a designClted Floodway, any increases in th~ lOO-year flood profile for the proposed RICD <br />facility (up to a maximum of one foot or a lesser amount[specified by local floodplain ordinances or codes, <br />whichever is more restrictive) must be documented. Proper notification of adverse impacts (increased <br />water surface elevCltions) must be provided to affectep property owners and a Letter of Map Revision <br />(LOMR) should be obtained as required by FEMA for National Flood Insurance Program purposes. <br /> <br /> <br />2It is recommended tha boating course consist of appropri e materials and installation to endure <br />velocities, shear stresses, othe osive conditions, sedi ation, Clnd debris that would be experienced <br />over its design life. and during high f flood) cond' , ,",s. For example, a boulder drop structure should <br />be constructed with materiClI having suitab <br />such a manner that it is anchored into the st m nk ~nd streambed to survive long-term operation and <br />flood events. Proper durability of the fa ' Ity will aSSI : he applicant in avoiding costly repairs and <br />; <br />maintenance. and may help to ovoid p ible abandonme~t 0 e RICD water right in the future. <br /> <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.