BOARD01267 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

4-80CW97 4-80CW 119 Lake Fork ofthe Gunnison Lake Fork ofthe Gunnison 35/20 45/25 3/17/1980 3/17/1980 . The Applicant has agreed to the following tenns and conditions: . At times when the CWCB's instream flow water rights on the Lake Fork ofthe Gunnison River are not satisfied, Applicant agrees to curtail its surface diversions or augment injurious surface diversions in time, place and amount. . At times when the CWCB's ins(n:arn flow water rights on the Lake Fork of the Gunnison River are not satisfied, Applicant agrees augment the depletions associated with its wells in time, place and amount. . The Applicant also has agreed to install, maintain, and monitor such measuring devices as may be required by the State and Division engineer to administer the tenns of the decree. (3) Case No, S-02CW390; Gus and Anita Achey et aI, The Board ratified this statement of opposition in March 2003. The Board's main objective in filing a statement of opposition in this case was to assure that the Applicant replaced injurious depletions in time, place, and amount. The Applicant has voluntarily dismissed the application. (4) Case No. 5-03CW132; No.6 King Ditch The Board ratified this statement of opposition in September 2003. The Board's main objective in filing a statement of opposition in this case was to assure that the Applicant did not divert this senior water right at the upstream alternate point of diversion at times when the CWCB' s intervening instream flow water right . was not being satisfied. The Staff, in cooperation with the Attorney General's Office, has negotiated a settlement that assures that the CWCB's instream flow water rights will not be injured. The Board holds the following instream flow rights that could have been injured by this application: Case No. 5-85CW637A Stream Mesa Creek Amount (cfs) 2.5 Annronriation Date 11/8/1985 The Applicant has agreed to the following tenns and conditions: · At times when the CWCB's instream flow water right on Mesa Creek is not satisfied the Applicant will not divert its water right at the upstream alternate point of diversion. · The Applicant also has agreed to install, maintain, and monitor such measuring devices as may be required by the State and Division engineer to administer the tenns of the decree. (5) Case No. 6-01CWI08; Catamount Development, Inc. The Board ratified this statement of opposition on November 25, 2002. The Board's main objective in filing a statement of opposition in this case was to assure that the Applicant did not divert this senior water right at the upstream alternate points of diversion at times when the CWCB's intervening instream flow water right was not being. The Staff, in cooperation with the Attorney General's Office, has negotiated a settlement that assures that the CWCB's instream flow water rights will not be injured. . The Board holds the following instream flow rights that could have been injured by this application: