My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01239
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01239
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:59:17 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:51:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
11/22/1999
Description
OWC Section - Federal Issues - National Drought Policy Commission Draft Report
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />supplies sufficient for firefighting, It can help all stakeholders decide whether they would benefit <br />from simulated drought-response exercises like those conducted by the Army Corps of Engineers . <br />and how best to assess effects on the environment that their drought-related actions might have. As <br />we heard during our deliberations, what local and state managers need are infonnation, impact- <br />reduction strategies, and education to assist in developing locally appropriate solutions. We also <br />heard that such assistance is not readily available from the federal government in many locations <br />and that existing technical assistance and training programs do not always address the specific <br />needs of stakeholders. <br /> <br />Planning and impact-reduction strategies underlie much of the work of some nonfederal drought- <br />related entities, including the Western Drought Coordination Council and Delaware River Basin <br />Commission, We heard that national drought policy would do well to foster similar work, where <br />currently no such entities exist, as well as peer exchanges among stakeholders to improve the <br />drought planning process. <br /> <br />Drought planning and impact-reduction measures can also help alleviate the critical effect that <br />drought has on increasing the risk of wildfire in forests and grasslands. More training and technical <br />assistance, we learned, can aid stakeholders in incorporating proactive measures to help overcome <br />the three major difficulties that a 1996 report of the Western Governors' Association noted the <br />states face in attempting to respond to and manage drought-related wildfires: 1) the financial <br />burdens to prepare for and fight drought-related wildfires, 2) a lack of proper training and <br />resources, and 3) restoring forest and grassland health. <br /> <br />One important issue that stakeholders often find difficult to incorporate into drought planning and <br />impact-reduction measures is consideration of how their drought-related actions may affect the <br />natural environment. We heard that environmental resources often receive inadequate attention <br />during drought emergencies and in drought planning, not so much because oflack of concern but <br />because of lack of expertise in this arena and sometimes from lack of awareness. For example, <br />drought-planning entities often fail to detennine which drought-related environmental impacts can <br />be tolerated and which cannot and therefore would benefit from appropriate drought impact- <br />reduction measures. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Stakeholder planning and impact-reduction efforts provide opportunities for the general public to <br />become involved and invested in drought-related decisions-,forexample, adopting water <br />conservation measures year round-and to learn more about drought, leading to greater self-reliance <br />and self-detennination. They also emphasize local solutions based on consideration of all affected <br />entities and related issues, including legal, economic, geographic, climate, religious, and cultural <br />differences; fairness and equity; and environmental concerns. These opportunities are lost where <br />stakeholders are not sufficiently trained or motivated to engage in drought planning. <br /> <br />[PLACEHOLDER_DISCUSSION OF WHAT PLANNING ENTAILS AND ITS LIMITATIONS <br />IF NOT IMPLEMENTED (AND A DISCUSSION OF WHAT RISK MANAGEMENT IS ???)] <br /> <br />The second category of needs focuses on providing easily understood infonnation for use in <br />drought-related planning, impact-reduction, and training and technical assistance programs, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.