My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01217
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01217
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:59:07 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:51:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
5/24/1999
Description
WSP Section - Colorado River Basin Issues - Upper Colorado River Commissioner's Report - Outline of the Law of the Colorado River
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Agenda Item 9k. part 1 <br /> <br />Colorado Water Conservation Board <br />Durango, Colorado <br />May 25, 1999 <br /> <br />Outline of the Law of the Colorado River <br />James S. Lochhead <br />Brownstein, Hyatt & Farber, P.C. <br />Glenwood Springs, CO <br />Colorado Commissioner to the Upper Colorado Basin Commission <br /> <br />I. WATER ALLOCATION ISSUES <br /> <br />A. <br /> <br />Colorado River Compact <br />I. Apportions consumptive use of the waters of the Colorado River Basin <br />2. 7.5 mafto Upper Basin, 8.5 mafto Lower Basin (including Lower Basin <br />Tributaries) <br />3. Upper Basin may not deplete the flow of the Colorado River Mainstem below 75 <br />mafin any IO-yearperiod <br />4. 1922 Compact, Article III (e) -- "The States ofthe upper division shall not <br />withhold water, and the States of the lower division shall not require the delivery <br />of water, which cannot reasonably be applied to domestic and agricultural uses." <br />5. Did not deal with Indian reserved rights or Mexican deliver issues <br />6. Lower Basin (California) View - Compact necessary to secure political support <br />for Congress to authorize constl1lction of Hoover Dam and the All-American <br />Canal <br />7. Upper Basin View - Compact was necessary to achieve security: <br />a. A defined right to develop, in perpetuity, See --Article III(a) <br />b. No interstate operation ofthe prior appropriation doctrine, See -- Articles <br />III(a), III(e), IV(b), VIII <br />c. Eliminating the threat of federal control over water allocation, both intra- <br />and inter-state, and preserving intrastate prior appropriation and <br />administration, See -- Articles III(a), III(b), III(c), IV, VII, Boulder <br />Canyon Project Act <br />d. A voiding litigation, See ,- Article I <br />e. Establishing a foundation for the comprehensive development of <br />reservoirs in the basin, See --1928 Boulder Canyon Proj ect Act, 1956 <br />Colorado River Storage Project Act, 1968 Colorado River Basin Project <br />Act <br /> <br />B. Mexican Water Treaty - Creates "first call" on the River of 1.5 maflyr., delivered at the <br />international boundary <br />1. Lower Basin View - Upper Basin shares one-half of the burden <br />2. Upper Basin View - Lower Basin bears entire burden <br /> <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.