My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01164
CWCB
>
Chatfield Mitigation
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01164
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:58:40 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:50:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
3/21/2006
Description
CWCB Director's Report
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
96
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />'I,.,:; <br /> <br />Lands 4S, 1400 Independence Ave., SW, Mailstop 1124, Washington, DC, 20250-0003. Send faxed <br />comments to (202) 205- I 604. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The President's fiscal year 2007 budget includes a legislative proposal to reauthorize SRS for an <br />additional five years and to allow the Forest Service to sell approximately 200,000 to 300,000 acres. The <br />money received from the sales (up to $800 million) would provide funding to extend the SRS, which <br />expires on Sept. 30, 2006. To date, states have received a total of approximately $1.9 billion ($2.5 billion <br />including Bureau of Land Management payments) through the SRS legislation. <br /> <br />Colorado's Senators Disagree with Land Sale Proposal: On Feb 28 Sens. Wayne Allard and Ken <br />Salazar opposed the Bush administration plan to sell off federal forest lands to help rural towns. The <br />senators were among opponents in both parties questioning the plan. Salazar said Colorado is slated to <br />sell of7.2 percent of the federal lands, but will receive only 1.67 percent of the annual funding. He noted <br />that while he was not opposed to the principle of selling federal land, he was troubled by the idea of doing <br />it to fill a budgetary need. Sen. Allard stated that he had a number of questions and concerns about the <br />. proposal, which he believes faces an uphill battle in Congress <br /> <br />Domenlcl Says Forest Service Budget F1exlbUlty Necessary as Southwest Faces Major Drought: <br />With much of New Mexico having gone 100 days without measurable precipitation and severe drought <br />conditions forecast, on Feb IS U.S. Senator Pete Domenici said the U.S. Forest Service must be ready to <br />direct resources to what could very well be one of the worst wildfire seasons ever. <br /> <br />Domenici and Senator Jon Kyl (R-Ariz.) have written USDA Undersecretary Mark Rey, who oversees the <br />Forest Service, asking the federal agency to make resources available to combat wildfire dangers in New <br />Mexico and Arizona this year---despite recommendations in the FY2006 and FY2oo7 budgets to fund the <br />implementation of the Pacific Northwest Forest Plan. The Senators believe the funding and resource focus . <br />shouJt\"be on areas where severe droughts are predicted, like the Southwest. , <br /> <br />Kyl and Domenici told Rey that it is crucial that New Mexico and Arizona have resources now to perform <br />forest thinning projects that will help prevent fires, as well as assets to more quickly battle wildfires early. <br /> <br />The President's FY2007 budget request seeks $912 million for the Healthy Forest Initiative carried out by <br />the Forest Service and Interior Department. This is a $5.0 million increase over the FY2006 enacted level, <br />and $220 million increase over FY2004 funding. The budget, however, also recommends a nearly $100 <br />million increase to implement the Clinton administration's Pacific Northwest Forest Plan. <br /> <br />The "Drought Watch on the Rio Grande," issued by the Texas Agricultural Experiment Station on <br />predicted continued below-nonnal precipitation through April for the Southwest, including the Rio <br />Grande Basin and Southern Arizona. <br /> <br />Lawsuit FlIed Alleging Vlolatiou of Grand Canyon Protection Act: On Feb 15, the Center for <br />Biological Diversity, Sierra Club, Glen Canyon Intitute, Living Rivers, and the Arizona Wildlife <br />Federation filed a lawsuit against the Bureau of Reclamation and Secretary of the Interior Gale Norton <br />alleging that the defendants are violating the Grand Canyon Protection Act by operating Glen Canyon <br />Dam in a way that fails to "protect, mitigate adverse impacts to, and improve the values for which Grand <br />Canyon National Park and Glen Canyon National Recreation Area were established." The defendants are <br />also charged of being in violation of the Endangered Species Act by having failed to reinitiate <br />consultation with the US Fish and Wildlife Service in the face of new information regarding the effects of <br />the dam upon the humpback chub, razorback sucker, Colorado pikeminnow and bonytail chub, and are in <br />violation of the National Environmental Policy Act by failing to prepare a supplemental environmental . <br /> <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.