Laserfiche WebLink
<br />'- <br /> <br />of grant funds in consultation with the CW A representatives (without the need for ratification by the full <br />Board and Commission). The revised CWPF Grant Program Guidance Document was posted on the web <br />pages of the CWCB and the WQCC on March I, 2006. This document can be found at: . <br />http://cwcb.state.co.uslRules.htm. <br /> <br />Water QuaUty-Water Quantity Coordination Meeting. The next meeting is scheduled for April 6, <br />2006. We will provide an update at the May Board meeting. <br /> <br />Sen. Salazar's Statement on OLM's Mineral Leasing Decision: On Feb. 7, U.S. Senator Ken Salazar <br />announced he was pleased that the Bureau of Land Management has decided to conduct further analysis <br />of the parcels in San Miguel county. He also noted his disappointment with decision to move forward <br />with leasing the minerals under land located within the watersheds serving the communities of Palisade <br />and Grand Junction. He believed postponing the lease sale for a short period of time while the affected <br />parties could evaluate the effect of drilling on their watersheds was a reasonable request and the BLMs <br />response is not only disappointing but short sighted. <br /> <br />Rep. Musgrave Goes to Oat for Three Rural Colorado Counties: On Feb. 6, U.S. Representative <br />Marilyn Musgrave (CO-04) petitioned Department of Agriculture officials to reconsider a Conservation <br />Reserve Program (CRP) wavier request that was previously denied. In a letter to Farm Service Agency <br />Administrator Teresa Lasseter, the Congresswoman stressed the importance of protecting the soil and <br />economies in this drought wrecked region by relating these three counties to the neighboring Kiowa, <br />Crowley, and Pueblo Counties that were approved. Farm Service Agencies in these counties requested a <br />waiver from the statutory 25 percent cropland limitation requirement for the CRP. The waiver to exceed <br />the limitation was approved by the State of Colorado, but it was denied at the federal level. However, the <br />neighboring counties were approved. In the past, all six of these Colorado counties were granted waivers. <br />CRP funds have protected the soil from erosion and, if the waiver is not granted, the counties will face <br />soil erosion problems because crops will be placed back in production. . <br /> <br />Bm Makes Water a Cash Crop: In early February, a House panel approved a measure that would allow <br />farmers to lease water they don't use as part of their rotational crop management plans. The measure, <br />lIB 1124, allows a water judge to approve contracts for lease of that water without harming their long- <br />term water rights, said Rep. Mary Hodge, D-Brighton. Proponents say the bill would help preserve <br />Colorado's agriculture industry by making water a renewable crop, instead of a one-time sale that puts <br />farmers out of business and drains the rural economy. <br /> <br />The Rotational Crop Management Bill would knock down legal barriers that demand all or nothing for <br />farmers willing to sell water - and by extension, their trade - to cities. <br />When cities buy water rights, they usually get the land in the deal, even though the real estate has little or <br />no value for agriculture or development. The crop- management bill, introduced by state Rep. Mary <br />Hodge, D-Brighton, would allow farmers to keep their land but sell the water that would have been used <br />to irrigate it. Farmers then could let parts of their land lie fallow or grow crops that don't need irrigation, <br />such as winter wheat or certain varieties of corn and alfalfa, as they sell water to cities. Farmers also <br />could rotate the portion of their land designated to yield water, the same way they rotate crops. <br /> <br />Some Southern Colorado water officials said that while on the surface, the bill appears to give farmers <br />more options, the measure would tie up senior water rights and possibly harm junior water rights owners. <br />Hodge said that's unlikely because the fallowing contracts must he approved by a water court judge, <br />whose job is to consider the injury any decree would have on water users. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />10 <br />