Laserfiche WebLink
<br />" <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Added Agenda Item 6h <br />Case No. 5-90CW3l1; Hamilton Creek <br /> <br />....."....:-. -,. <br /> <br />Case Summarv <br /> <br />The Board at its November 27, 1990, meeting appropriated the following instream flow water right <br />on Hamilton Creek: <br /> <br />Case No. <br /> <br />Stream <br /> <br />Amount <br /> <br />Approp. Date <br /> <br />5-90CW311 <br /> <br />Hamilton Creek <br /> <br />1.5 (4/15-8/14) <br />0.35 (8/15-4/14) <br /> <br />11/27/90 <br /> <br />The location of this stream segment through which the instream flow is claimed is from the Denver <br />Water Board Diversion and extending to the confluence with Hurd Creek, being a distance of <br />approximately 3.0 miles. <br /> <br />This application was opposed by Thomas Kerwin, Hurd Creek Ranch, the City of Englewood and <br />the City and County of Denver. <br /> <br />Instream Flow Aopropriation Adiustment as oer Rule 5.60 <br /> <br />As per Rule 5.60 of the ISF Rules and Regulations, staff is requesting the Board reduce the amount <br />of water sought in the Hamilton Creek Instream Flow reach requested in Case No. 5-90CW282, <br />because of valid water availability concerns raised by the objectors. Staff is requesting the following <br />time periods be adjusted to more accurately reflect current stream conditions: <br /> <br />Case No. <br /> <br />Stream <br /> <br />Amount <br /> <br />Aporoo. Date <br /> <br />5-90CW311 <br /> <br />Hamilton Creek <br /> <br />1.50 (6/15-8/14) <br />0.50 (8/15-4/14) <br />1.00 (4/15-6/14) <br /> <br />1lI27/90 <br /> <br />This change in the application shall not be deemed a modification that is required to follow the <br />procedures in Section 10 of the Rules and Regulations. <br /> <br />L:\BOARDMEMlmay98\Added Item 6h.doc <br />