My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01143
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01143
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:58:33 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:50:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
12/11/1953
Description
Minutes and Resolution
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />321 <br /> <br />voir 22, now in process of construction on South Boulder <br />Creek, and certain other related facilities, all this water <br />will be available to her; and that will come to pass long <br />before 1963. Based upon Denver's own formula for per capita <br />use, this will supply a city with e population of 777,500, <br />roughly 50% more people than Denver nmv claims to have. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Denver says that, by the year 2000, her population will reach <br />one million. Let.us aSSume the accuracy of that estimate. <br />Denver demands that, in addition to her present water supply, <br />she be permitted to take from the Blue River a minimum of <br />177,000 acre feet. Again using Denver's own formula of per <br />capita consumption, that amount would supply a population <br />of 750,000 people. Thus Denver, with enough water for a <br />city with a population 50% greater than she now has, states <br />that the emergency she faces is so grave and dire 'that your <br />Board should now make it possible for her to supply a city <br />three times her present size. This is the emergency she <br />says justified your endangering the livelihoods and futures <br />of the citizens of two counties, by proceeding without that <br />reliable, adequate information which prudent men must re- <br />quire if they are to meet their responsibilities as repre- <br />sentatives of all the people. <br /> <br />The chief executive has said, through the press, that he <br />will take this controversy to the people, if a satisfactory <br />compromise settlement be not reached by the participants. <br />Let that be done; but let all the facts, including those <br />herein related, be taken to the people. <br /> <br />Denver, through a statement credited by the press to the <br />mayor, states that she is willing, if her own water needs <br />be met, to compromise, I assume by letting water users in <br />Grand and Summit Counties use the water that is left, if <br />there is any. Denver measures her needs by her demands. <br />She has never receded one inch from her demand for a <br />minimum (and I use that term advisedly) of 177,000 acre <br />,feet. Vrere Denver's needs only to be met, not her arbi- <br />trary demands, it is possible that there would come into <br />existence some area of agreement. Until that time arrives, <br />our only course is to resist Denver's demands, as Mr. De- <br />laney has said, wherever opposition thereto seems appropri- <br />ate.n <br /> <br />Mr. Bailey: "Bob, do you want Mr. Jex to make his presentation <br />Or any other statements?" <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />.Mr. Jex: "I am a relatively junior man in water matters. <br />Some eight years ago the Water Board, its Chief engineer, its <br />Engineering staff and also we people in Western Colorado felt <br />that we had a large water supply to be used in the' State of Colo- <br />rado. It was indicated at that time, only eight years ago, that <br />there was a possibility of making a diversion from the Gunnison <br />River to the Arkansas Valley of about 850,000 acre-feet. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.