Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Interested Parties <br />Page 2 <br />July 2, 1999 <br /> <br />7. With reference to Rule 5.63(B), the phrase "without good cause" should be placed after <br />the word "it." <br /> <br />8. With reference to Rule 5.63(C), the word "working" should be placed after the word <br />"five" at the beginning of the sentence. In addition, it is unclear whether the word <br />"provide" means delivered by that date or mailed by that date. Finally, subparagraph (vi) <br />of this Rule should reference "a summary of' all written testimony to be offered. <br /> <br />9. With reference to Rule 5.63(E), the phrase "to the extent then known" should be added to <br />the very end thereof. <br /> <br />10. There seems to be some potential for confusion between Rule 5.63(F) and 5.63(G). <br />While the former allows the Hearing Coordinator to establish a "reasonable period of <br />time" for the submission of written rebuttal statements, the latter seems to limit that <br />period of time to ten days. Is that the intent? In addition, it appears that rebuttal <br />statements will be received very close to the actual hearing date. Perhaps this time frame <br />should be extended. <br /> <br />II. <br /> <br />Thought should be given to revising Rule 5.64(A) concerning notice of all hearings so as <br />to encompass notice of the prehearing conference and the date for submission of <br />prehearing statements. <br /> <br />'. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br />