Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Ground water monitoring wells 2, 3,4, 5 and 10 are highly correlated with the stage of <br />Spring Creek eTable 2). In addition, wells 2, 3, 4 and 5 are highly correlated with each other. <br />This indicates that there is one main water source supplying the springs, which supports Spring <br />Creek, as is shown schematically in Figure 8 as well. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Table 2. Correlation coefficients of ground water monitoring wells with each other and the <br />Spring Creek staff gauge, which is weill. Rows and columns refer to each well number. <br /> <br /> 2 3 4 5 7 10 <br />1 0.878 0.966 0.954 0.954 0.35 0.785 <br />2 <br />3 0.864 0.902 0.955 <br />4 0.969 0.901 0.97 <br />5 0.951 0.955 0.97 <br /> <br />Figure 8. Schematic cross section of the Spring Creek watershed. Snowmelt and rain recharges <br />the Ragged Mountain front and percolates into the landslide debris. Ground water flows west <br />eright) through the landslide debris, which is perched on Mancos Shale, and discharges at the <br />slump that formed the Spring Creek sites. Base flow discharge from the landslide debris aquifer . <br />is low (solid arrow), but early summer flows are much higher (dashed arrow). <br /> <br /> <br />Ragged <br />Mountains <br /> <br /> <br />slump created Spring <br />Creek site <br /> <br />./ <br />.... <br /> <br />........ <br /> <br />~... <br /> <br />........ <br />---- <br />Mancos Shale <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />...... ~ <br /> <br />...................... <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />10 <br />