My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01119
CWCB
>
Chatfield Mitigation
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01119
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:58:22 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:50:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
2/11/1965
Description
Minutes
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />with reference to those nontributary ground <br />waters, the state would not be in any position <br />to regulate them at all under the police power. <br />It's been held by our courts over the years that <br />the Constitution itself with reference to waters <br />of natural streams is self-executing. To me <br />that means, and we have cases that have recog- <br />nized this, that the diversion and appropriation <br />to a beneficial use is the measure of the right <br />and it means that a person can appropriate water <br />and use it without the benefit of any statute. <br />Now we know what kind of a chaotic state we <br />would be in if we had no regulations of these <br />waters. We have to visualize a dual concept, <br />that the waters belong to the public and it's <br />the use of these waters that is dedicated to <br />the people. <br /> <br />On surface streams we follow the appropria- <br />tion doctrine. There is only one doctrine of <br />underground water with which I am familiar that <br />doesn't recognize a use as being the measure <br />of the right and that is the old common law own- <br />ership, that is, that a person who owns to the <br />sky owns to the center of the earth everything <br />that's under it. But water is flowing under <br />this land; it's constantly in a state of flux. <br />So we know that as a first step, if we are going <br />to have any effective regulation, any integra- <br />tion of our surface and underground waters where <br />we know that it is a part of the same source <br />where it is tributary, we have to start with the <br />concept that the waters belong to the public <br />and are dedicated to the use of the people. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The four theories briefly of underground <br />water are the common law theory which I have <br />already mentioned; the appropriation theory <br />which permits the person to use the water wherever <br />he may within his appropriative rights; the <br />correlative use theory which is followed in <br />California that landowners over an aquifer have <br />an equitable right to make a use of that water <br />on the lands over the aquifer; the American <br />doctrine of reasonable use which is followed in <br />a good many of these western states that the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.