My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01112
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01112
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:58:19 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:50:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
1/24/2006
Description
CWCB Director's Report
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
133
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />.' <br /> <br />Schedule is overstated, and expressed significant concern associated with the interim 14,85 MAF 602(aO <br />storage requirement in Lake Powell. Arizona believes that using the 14,85 MAF requirement will result <br />in an improper protection of power and other subordinate uses, such as recreation, and may subordinate <br />Lower Division states' beneficial consumptive uses in violation of the Law of the River," <br /> <br />California River Board Has Concerns about By-Pass Drainage Flow Issues: The California River <br />Board submitted a letter on Nov. 17 to Reclamation, expressing the Board's concerns and comments <br />regarding the process to develop potential methods to recover or replace the by pass drainage flows <br />Wellton-Mohawk Irrigation and Drainage District. The Board considers that replacement of the WMIDD <br />Bypass Flow is a national obligation and should be totally funded by federal monies; that Reclamation <br />should take steps to replace the bypass flow and increase the storage in the mainstream reservoir system; <br />that further land-fallowing programs in California are not likely at this time; and that some solutions for <br />Bypass Flow replacement may involve groundwater pumping in the Yuma, but other issues exist that <br />must be addressed before that implementing this option, <br /> <br />Lower Basin Reps Hold Retreat: On Nov 21-22, Lower Basin Representatives met to develop a <br />concept paper,containing working principles on the operation of the Colorado River System reservoirs <br />and how water form various sources might be managed within the constraints of the "Law ofthe River". <br />The Lower Basin States are discussing how bayous types of water might be managed and made available <br />to meet the water supply needs. Each of the Lower Basin States is continuing to internally discuss <br />potential elements of the seven basin states package. <br /> <br />Me~can National Water Commission Report: In July 2005 the Mexican National Water Commission <br />released a brief technical report regarding potential mitigation strategies to address the reduction in <br />recharge oflocal aquifers related to the lining of the All-American Canal in the United States, The report <br />outlines a series of actions that could be implemented to make up for this loss of water annually, These <br />actions could include: I) on-farm water conservation programs; 2) improvements to regional water <br />delivery and conveyance facilities; 3) conversion from well field supplied irrigation to surface water <br />supplied irrigation; 4) recovery of water supplies through transfer of water rights from adjacent irrigation <br />zones in the Mexicali Valley. The report estimates that through implementation of these carious <br />programs that nearly 64,000 AF of water could be recovered, <br /> <br />U.S/Mexican Tour Planned: The Water Education Foundation is sponsoring a special tour, March 1-3, <br />2006 on U.S,lMexican border water issues. Ted Kowalski of the Water Supply Protection Section is <br />planning to attend. <br /> <br />Two Organizations File Notice to Sue Reclamation: Two environmental organizations, Center for <br />Biological Diversity and Living Rivers, recently filed notice that they intend to sue Reclamation and the <br />U,S, Fish and Wildlife Service over the decline and extinction of native fishes below Glen Canyon Dam <br />and in Grand Canyon National Park, That basis for their notice was the USGS Circular Report of October <br />2005 that indicated efforts to restore the native fishes have not been as successful as hoped, <br /> <br />Colorado River Water Conservation District Opens 2006 Grants Program: Grants are available for <br />up to $15,000 for water-related projects, The competitive grant program closes on Jan, 31,2006, <br />Recipients will be announced in April 2006. Half of the funds will be issued once a contract is executed, <br />The remainder will be issued upon project completion, <br /> <br />The Colorado River District 2006 Grants Program considers projects that would: <br />Develop new water supplies; <br />Improve an existing water supply system; <br />Improve instream water quality; <br /> <br />37 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.