Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />Department of Energy's national laboratories to promote energy and water conservation by both finding <br />w~ys to increase energy supplies, while lowering water used in oil and gas production, etc, <br /> <br />The bill promotes the use of reclaimed waters, and new water development using new technologies. The <br />bilI calls for an assessment of existing federal research and creates an advisory board to identifY research <br />priorities and potential legal and regulatory issues, It also authorizes competitive grants to other <br />laboratories, agencies and non-governmental organizations. The bill authorizes $5M for FY2006, and <br />sums as needed for future years. Senator Ken Salazar (D-CO) is a cosponsor, <br /> <br />Legislation Ods USEP A Budget by $80 Million: USEP A's FY2006 budget will be reduced by I <br />percent across the board under spending legislation passed by a contentious Congress before members <br />recessed Dec. 22 for the holiday season, <br /> <br />Included in the $453 billion military spending bill (HR 2863), which was stripped by a Senate filibuster <br />of a provision to allow oil drilling in the Alaska National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR), is a I percent <br />reduction of all FY2006 discretionary spending, which translates into a nearly $80 million cut to <br />USEPA's Budget (HR 2361), <br /> <br />The govemment-wide reduction was Congress's response to an earlier White House Request to rescind <br />$2.3 billion, including $166 million in Clean Water State Revolving Fund (CWSRF) resources, to help <br />cover recovery costs associated with this past summer's devastating Gulf Coast hurricanes. Congress had <br />previously approved $900 mi\1ion for the CWSRF in FY2006, which is $120 million more that the White <br />House requested but $191 million less than in FY2005. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />A I percent reduction to the CWSRF would leave it at $891 million, and the same cut to the approved <br />$850 million Drinking Water SRF budget would leave it at $841.5 million. <br /> <br />Weather Modifieation Bills in Congress: There are two WM bills in Congress this year, S,517 <br />sponsored by Texas Senator Hutchison and the companion HR 2995 sponsored by Colorado <br />Congressman Mark Udall. S, 517 has had a hearing in front of Congress and passed out of the Commerce, <br />Science and Transportation Committee. If passed this new bill would have a board of scientists would be <br />able to dole out federal research money for weather modification, How much money will be appropriated <br />for grants remains to be seen. The bill initially plalUled to set aside $10 million a year for 10 years to <br />enable researchers to come up with ideas to control the hazards of weather or provide benefits like water <br />resource management. The money is less than scientists wished for, but much higher than the current <br />amount heing spent on weather modification: zero, But during the committee mark-up in mid-November, <br />the language was changed to remove the specific dollar amount and provide "funding as necessary," The <br />bill was also amended to move the proposed program out of the Commerce Department into the White <br />House, Despite the apparent setback for proponents of the bill, a companion measure sponsored by Rep. <br />Mark Udall, D-Colo" is awaiting action in the House, Joe Golden of NOAA in Boulder said, he's still <br />optimistic that money could be set aside, and even though he feels "it's been watered down from the <br />original, it's better than nothing," <br /> <br />The Wyoming Water Development Commission is undertaking an $8,8M, five-year cloud-seeding <br />project, in collaboration with the National Center for Atmospheric Research, a federally funded facility in <br />Boulder, Colorado, Mountain snowpack is a critical reservoir of water in the West, and Wyoming hopes <br />to raise the level of that supply, Several states have invested millions over the years, primarily using <br />planes and ground based generators to "seed" clouds with silver iodide and other media as a catalyst to <br />produce more precipitation (and also reduce risks of damaging hail storms), However, the results are <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />13 <br />