My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Board Meeting 01/14/1985
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
Board Meeting 01/14/1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:57:48 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:49:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
1/14/1985
Description
Agenda, Minutes, Memos
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
200
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />The seven Colo~ado Rive~ Basin States met on Decembe~ 14, <br />1984. to discuss p~oposed amendments to the bill. The <br />following majo~ issues came up: <br /> <br />1. Definition of what the "Ta~get Maximum Flood Release of <br />40,000 cfs" should ~ep~esent. <br /> <br />2. Conce~n on the part of the Bu~eau of Reclamation that <br />the ~elease of peaking powe~ flows f~om Hoover Dam not <br />be adve~sely.affected. <br /> <br />3. Conce~n that the establishment and ope~ation of a <br />floodway not affect the "Law of the Rive~." <br /> <br />4. Whether o~ not the Sec~eta~y of the Inte~io~ should be <br />authorized to purchase land and/or p~ope~ty within the <br />floodway. <br /> <br />5. Need fo~ more p~ecise definition of the membe~ship, <br />st~uctu~e. and ~esponsibilities assigned to the <br />Colo~ado Rive~ Floodway Task Fo~ce established unde~ <br />the act. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />No ~esolution was ~eached on these issues by the seven <br />Basin States. The states met in ea~ly Janua~y, 1985, to <br />fu~the~ discuss the p~oposed legislation. The ~esults of these <br />discussions we~e ~epo~ted to the Boa~d at the meeting. <br /> <br />Aqenda Item 14 - Colo~ado Rive~ Enhanced Snowpack Test (CREST) <br />- Appendix I <br /> <br />In his ~epo~t on this item. M~. McDonald ~ecalled the Boa~d <br />discussion of the p~oposed CREST p~og~am in seve~al p~evious <br />meetings. He stated that the p~oposal made by the Bu~eau of <br />Reclamation seve~al months ago called fo~ the costs of the <br />p~og~am to be p~o~ated among the alleged beneficia~ies of the <br />p~og~am. <br /> <br />M~. McDonald mentioned that the Gove~no~ sha~es the Boa~d's <br />conce~n about CREST and has w~itten to Commissioner of <br />Reclamation Olson to exp~ess his dissatisfaction with the <br />p~oposed p~og~am. Mr. Olson ~esponded and invited the <br />Gove~no~'s thoughts on how to add~ess the un~esolved issues <br />which a~e of conce~n to Colo~ado. <br /> <br />M~. Getches called the Board's attention to his lette~ of <br />Septembe~ 5, 1984, to M~. Cliffo~d Ba~~ett. Regional Di~ecto~, <br />Bureau of Reclamation. Uppe~ Colo~ado Region, in which M~. <br />Getches spelled out the conditions unde~ which the State of <br />Colo~ado would endo~se the CREST p~oposal. These include: <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />-9- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.