My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01045
CWCB
>
Chatfield Mitigation
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01045
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:57:30 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:49:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
7/27/1977
Description
Agenda, Minutes, Resolution
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />MR. BENTON: Ith~nk, just: to voice our opposition to. the usurpation of <br />state's-rights. <br /> <br />MR. SPARKS: I don't think we ,will have too much disagree~nt within <br />the Department of Natural Resources~I think-whatever a~eas of dis- <br />agreement ther~, are wi-ll be small ,and we c~n iro~ them out.- <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />- ~ <br />MR. S'l;APLETON; ,Mr. Jackson, f am going to -suggest tha.t mayb~ you can: <br />~ork on that reso1ut~on du~ing, the noon recess. And:I think it is <br />important to have it right and perhaps'more expansive than you origi- <br />na1~y suggested~ So, with your permissioq and the permission of the <br />second, why don '.t we defer yotingon that: Maybe- Mary can help you get <br />somethi-qg -in writing that we can: look at at that time;- <br /> <br />MR. JACKSON: That is fine.- -:; ~ - <br /> <br />. . . -, . <br />MR. STAPLETON: We-will call for couunents froni the floor in a minute. <br />Are there any~further comments from the members of tlte~Boardabout the <br />~esource policy or the ,meetings in Denver tomorrow? . <br /> <br />MR~ SHERMAN: I want .to make one point, ~Ben, -and that is"i:hat I 'think <br />we are all outraged by the process. The impression I get is that this <br />exercise at the national level is going to go forward. I think it is <br />in our best. interest to try to resPQnd constructively. Hopefully, we <br />can ge.t the time that 'we ,need' tQ make a meaningful contribution. I <br />really think that if we are:to make' an impact on.that process, we-will <br />have to take:a constructive; tone. I think -if we do anything else they <br />are going to virtually ignore:us., as : they: have in the past; I want tQ <br />stress that. <br /> <br />~ <br />:MR. FETCHER: :1 want to _ask one-more quest~on. <br />implement the groups that are going to work on <br /> <br />. - <br />How are -we goiqg to . <br />these four areas? - : <br /> <br />MR. SPARKS: - My th~nking on: that: was th~t: the Board would take the <br />r~sponsi~ility and direct me to organize the task force immediately. <br /> <br />- . <br />MR. STAP.LETON: BY -what date? <br /> <br />MR. SPARKS: Let's say by:about the:15th of August. This is.about ten <br />days.- <br /> <br />- <br />MR. STAPLETON: Will that give you enough t~? Harris, that won't <br />give you mucq time. _ <br /> <br />MR. 1?HE~N: I would anticipate 'that some of the divisions 'in the I <br />depar~~entwil1 be working on some.of: these forces that Larry puts <br />toge1;:her. "1' t~ink it is impo1;'tant that'~e try to reach some kind of. <br />consensus on these ma~ters as~soonas possible. The task force ought <br />to reflect that community of interest. So I don't think that is too <br />muchofa problem., If we can get something five to seven days before <br />the de~dline, Larry, I: ~hinkthat would_be adequate for my purposes.- <br /> <br />MR. STAPLETON: Do we have a motion? <br /> <br />-14- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.