Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> David Harrison: Or further specially define, the right. And that could include the peale So I <br />i I think we'll push this thing too far here if we...now is there anything <br />, <br /> essential to clarify further on this point, otherwise let's let Eric go back to <br /> making the motion. <br /> Eric Kuhn: I think with that, that would complete my motion then. <br /> David Harrison: We have the same type$ of changes elsewhere in the language that we did <br /> on the Yampa, right? <br /> Eric Kuhn: The same changes, the same format as the Yampa, the differences are the <br /> base flow, is the flow that was recommended that's identified by the staff <br /> in the handout that is identified which is called...its referred to being the; <br /> DOW/staff option, OK. Or staff recommendation...excuse me, its staff <br /> recommendation in CFS, that's what its referred to in the Colorado, with <br /> the exception of September, the September flow will be 680 not 8 I O. OK, <br /> the carveout would be 100,000 modifiable, and that would be )< the base <br /> flow. ,The recovery right, the modifiable amount...excuse me, the recovery <br /> flow..the carveout would be 100,000 acre feet, modifiable up to a total of <br /> 400,000 acre feet. Yeah, OK, I need to point that out too, in the <br /> application, Wendy, we would be filing for, since we already have an <br /> application pending for 581, we would be filing....the application would be e <br /> for the differences between the base flow now...those amounts shown here <br /> and what we also ultimately get on our decree in 581 case. <br /> Jim Lochhead: In other words, this is not stacking this group on top. <br /> (off-mike comments) <br /> David Harrison: The point is, you've got to be consistent in how you describe that. You <br /> describe 581 plus an increment of 300 and whatever, those two do stack, <br /> but noUo exceed a total of 810. Or you could describe 810 and provid' <br /> that it doesn't stack on top of 581. You could go either direction on that. <br /> And Wendy's gone a certain direction in the draft application. Looks like <br /> it works to me. <br /> Jim Lochhead: And the modification is ~ 400 ~'1f_, not by an additional _?_ <br /> C>O <br /> Eric Kuhn: Yes, up to a total of 4~ (?) (interference noise) the carveout is 100,000. <br /> The carveout will be modified up to a total of 400,000. <br /> David Harrison: Is ,there anything else to be... <br /> Eric Kuhn: And we would also assume I would have the same provision with respect - <br /> to, I think this stands with the hydrology, you know, what we added in the <br /> Yampa would also apply. <br />