Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />Colorado Inslltule for IrrlgaUon Managament (CSU) <br />January 24.25, 2001 <br /> <br />Agenda Item 14, <br /> <br />The Study <br />The study is an assessment of the potential for pressurized raw irriga1ion water for landscape use <br />In unincorporated and Incorporated areas in Colorado,' The study concentrates on the northern <br />Colorado Front Range, and on canai companies and irrigation districts that voluntarily wish to <br />provide this kind of water service to subdivisions and other water users, Lessons will be drawn <br />from similar practices on the West Slope as well as current practices in northeastern Colorado. <br />The study will be conducted in two parts and compieted in one year, <br /> <br />, <br />Part I will generate a re<:lionallevel report on the potential for expanding pressurized dual <br />system water service in northeastern Colorado, This: regional level report will address broad <br />opportunities and constraints for dual system develo~ment, including assessing the gap <br />between regional water supply and demand, and to what extent dual systems can bridge that <br />gap. Many of the supply, demand. benefit/cost and opportunity cost analyses for the region will <br />be based on the more specific case study analysis conducted in Part /I, <br /> <br />Part II will generate a more specific case studv report on two participating Irrigation companies <br />providers (The New Cache La Poudre Irrigating Company and the Highland Ditch Company,) <br />These companies have volunteered to cooperate as ,walk-through examples of potential <br />pressurized dual system development. This report oiJtlines a method that can be used by <br />agricultural water suppliers and engineering firms In initiating dual system development. The <br />examples will provide a "blueprint" for fully assessing opportunities and constraints, Water <br />supply and demand under current potential dual syst.em service, as well as projected supply <br />and demand under projected outbuilding or urban encroachment. into the service areas of these <br />two irrigation systems, will be modeled, <br /> <br />Study <br />Phase <br />Phase 1 <br />Phase 2 <br />Total <br /> <br />Cost Estlmllte <br />Cash and In- ; Amount <br />Kind :unfunded <br />$31.862 . $93.259 <br />$52,519 $42,872 <br />$84,381 $136.131 <br /> <br />74% <br />45% <br />62% <br /> <br />Total Cost <br /> <br />Percentage Unfunded <br /> <br />$125121 <br />$95,391 <br />$220.512 <br /> <br />Discussion <br /> <br />-- <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />27 <br /> <br />... <br /> <br />",. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Phase 1 of the study includes a large portion of the Sou1h Platte River Drainage, concentrating <br />on the northern front-range, The cost of new municipal raw water In this area has risen to the <br />point that it is not practical to use it for outslcle irrigation. Study results will be transferabie to <br />other areas of Colorado, which are also experiencing rapidly rising municipal water costs, and <br />to towns with limited capability to treat drinking water, For these reasons, Phase 1 of this study <br />should be classified as addressing an Issue of "stat'ewide impact or Importance." <br />! <br /> <br />Phase 2 of this study will include detailed feasibility lievel evaluation of two agricultural water <br />providers, and their potential to develop dual water ~ysterns within their service areas, Both <br />these Companies are aware of this study, and have !expressed interest in participating. If the <br />stUdy finds that dual water systems are feasible within their respective servioe areas there is a <br />good probability these Companies would proceed to built the infrastructure and provide the raw <br />water service, Larger systems in Colorado and Utah have infrastructure costs ranging from <br />$500K to $10M, Phase 2 of the stUdy has "".a sig!Jificant potential to result in a loan from <br />the ConstructIon Fund/Severance tax Trust Fund Perpetual Base Account. " . <br /> <br />2 <br />