Laserfiche WebLink
<br />'. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />;)t.'1 III :Lr1&t' <br /> <br />6- 7-96 ;12:52P~ <br /> <br />3036613026- <br /> <br />303 6663655;; 2! <br /> <br />C.UILSON, HAMMOND & P.A.DDOCK. LL.C. <br />ATTORNi,YS AT LAW <br /> <br />,.....AY 1041;:""0 ......MNONO <br />__'''''''lAM .... .....OOOCK <br />LCtE. M. ..IOlotM$OH <br />peTI" C, "l.E.....Na <br />E:LIZAe~T" "Ot..LOCK <br /> <br />..JO"N UNO~'" C"'''I..~O'''' <br />II~O-lg~1:1 <br /> <br />1700 lINeo",... $TA!:e:T, SUITe: 3'5aOQ <br />OENVe-P. COLORADO 80Z03....S3g <br /> <br />T~Le.P,...ON~ (303' 8&1....000 <br />Tr:.L~CO~Ie:" (3031 eel aozs <br /> <br />August 7, 1998 <br /> <br />Via Facsimile <br /> <br />Mr. David Beaujon <br />Colorado General Assembly <br />Legislative Council <br />State Capitol, Room 029 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203.1784 <br /> <br />Re: Stockman's Water Company, Ballot Initiatives Nos. 75 and No. 105 <br /> <br />Dear David: <br /> <br />I am writing co provide you with comments on the final drafts of the Ballot <br />Summaries for Stockman's Water Company's Initiatives Nos. 7S and No. 10S. My <br />comments on Initiative No. 7S are as follows: <br /> <br />One page 1, at the end of the sentence in line 13, I request that the following <br />sentence be added: <br /> <br />This proposal does not apply to wells of this type drilled into a <br />deeper aquifer that, in this case, is connected to the Rio Grande <br />and its tributaries in the San Luis Valley. <br /> <br />This addition is necessary to fully explain the scope of the wells regulated and to ensure that <br />the summary is consistent with the facts contained in argument number 3 against the <br />initiative. <br /> <br />, also believe that a fair ballot summary should disclose the potential T A80R impacts <br />on the revenues collected under this measure. The potential TABOR limitations are <br />significant and the voters should be aware that even though charges are assessed under this <br />proposal, it Is possible that those charges will be viewed as a taX Nt may have to be <br />refunded. At a minimum, this is an open legal question and the voters should be aware that <br />the legal question must be resolved in favor of Stockman's. in order for the initiative not to <br />have an adverse liscal impact on the slate's budget as a whole. <br /> <br />The comments on the Ballot SlImmary lor Initiative No. 105 are as follows: <br /> <br />First, on page 1, line 6, I suggest that sentence be revised to read as follows: <br />