Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1 7. <br />. <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Responder: William A. Paddock (Opponent) <br /> <br />Suggested change: Page 1, lines 7 and 23, and Page 2, line 15, ensure consistency of the language <br />used in this ballot analysis and the analysis pertaining. to the installation of water flow meters. <br /> <br />Basis for suggested change: The tenn "Rio Grande River" in this analysis appears to be more <br />narrowly defined than it is in the analysis pertaining to water flow meters. In this analysis, the tenn <br />"Rio Grande River" appears to pertain only to the named river and none of its tributaries. In the <br />analysis pertaining to water flow meters, "Rio Grande River" appears to refer to the Rio Grande River <br />and all of its tributaries. <br /> <br />Staff comment: Disagree. The tenn "Rio Grande River" in this analysis is not intended to have the <br />same meaning as the tenn in the analysis pertaining to water flow meters. The tenn "Rio Grande <br />River" is used appropriately in each analysis. <br /> <br />August 14, 1998 <br /> <br />- 4 - S..ILCSIPROJECTSIBAll.On98IPAYMENTSIFINALCOM. WPD <br />