My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01008
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:57:00 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:48:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
1/27/2004
Description
CWCB Director's Report
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />el <br /> <br />el <br /> <br />) <br /> <br />"With increasing populations and demand on our water supply, the strain on the Colorado River <br />has become overwhelming," stated Chairman Calvert. "Colorado, like many states in the West, is <br />experiencing a drought. The future of a reliable water supply will be dependent on the <br />development of new water technologies to increase efficiency. This hearing is intended to <br />discuss options available to relieve the stress on the Colorado River and other traditional water <br />supplies. " <br /> <br />Beauprez stated that, "Although most of the precipitation falls on the Western Slope, 80 percent <br />of the population resides on the Eastern Slope. For this reason, groundwater pumping is more <br />extensive in the eastern part of the State. Some are concerned that unsustainable groundwater <br />pumping occurs, particularly in the Denver basin. Colorado grew by_one million people in the <br />last decade, with growth projections estimated for another two million residents by 2020. <br />Meanwhile, like most western states, Colorado has experienced severe drought over the last few <br />years. " <br /> <br />At the current rate, our water supplies cannot keep up with population increases," said Rep. <br />Calvert. "We need to find new ways to provide water to both rural and urban users. Our entire <br />economy is based on the assumption that water is ready and available for us at any time. This <br />assumption could prove disastrous if we don't start planning now for future water supplies." <br /> <br />Copies of the statements provided by witnesses are available upon request. <br /> <br />New EPA Water Official: Benjamin Grumbles has been appointed as Acting Assistant <br />Administrator for Water, replacing Tracy Mehan III. He has served as EP A's Deputy Assistant <br />Administrator and Associate Administrator for Congressional and Intergovernmental Relations. <br />He also worked for the House Public Works Committee. <br /> <br />Florida MWD v. Miccosukee: Oklahoma and Washington joined New York, Connecticut, <br />Illinois, Kentucky, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Missouri, New Jersey, North Carolina and <br />Vermont in urging the U.S. Supreme Court to affirm the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeal's 2002 <br />decision that the pumping of polluted water into a more pristine water body constitutes the <br />pollution of navigable waters from a point source, requiring a National Discharge Elimination <br />System (NPDES) permit. <br /> <br />Colorado, New Mexico, Hawaii, Idaho, Nebraska, Nevada, North Dakota, South Dakota, Texas, <br />Utah and Wyoming have taken the opposite view. <br /> <br />Those who favor requiring permits argue that water transfers are subject to the Clean Water Act <br />since points of transfer are point sources and that inter-basin water transfers and water quality <br />concerns are not adequately handled by states through current non-point source programs. They <br />argue \hat the NPDES permitting process is the best means for controlling water pollution. <br /> <br />Colorado, on the other hand, argued that the transfer of water is not a "discharge" or original <br />source of pollution and that requiring an NPDES permit for transfers of water will effectively <br />prevent such transfers altogether. <br /> <br />The case was argued before the U.S. Supreme Court on Jan. l4. <br /> <br />ABA 22nd Annual Water Law Conference: The theme of this year's conference.is "Are States <br />Still in Charge?" The conference will be held in San Diego on Feb. 19-20. For information visit <br />www-oabanet,orgfenvironl-programs/wateFIawI-20\l4!flome.htrnl. <br /> <br />Federal Dam Safety Bill: Sen. Pete Domenici (R-NM) introduced S. 1727, to authorize <br />additional appropriations under the Reclamation Safety of Dams Act. Domenici noted that <br />Reclamation has authority to spend approximately $974 million on dam safety projects, but only <br />$109 million remains uncommitted. He believes that there is a need for at least $540 million <br />more. <br /> <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.