Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br />was general consensus that the Pilot Bank could be a useful first step, and that water interests wanted to give <br />.the pilot program a fair chance of success. There may be an opportunity for state agencies [such as Parks <br />and DOW] that occasionally purchase stored water in the basin to utilize the pilot bank for those transactions <br />as a way of generating business for this demonstration project. Staff will continue to participate and provide <br />assistance to the State Engineer and basin water interests as the pilot program is developed and implemented. <br /> <br />Colorado River Basin Issues <br /> <br />Colorado River Field Hearing: On July 9th, the House Resources Subcommittee on Water and Power held <br />a field hearing in Salt Lake City, Utah on seven states' use ofthe Colorado River. Representatives from Utah, <br />Colorado, California, Wyoming, New Mexico, Nevada, and Arizona addressed the subcommittee. The <br />overall message from the states was that the seven states of the Colorado River Drainage Basin can well <br />manage the waters of the Colorado, and any federal action must be in conjunction with state laws, interstate <br />compacts, and the Law of the River. Individual representatives each strongly stated their conviction that any <br />federal action must be made only with the involvement and consultation with the seven states. Summaries of <br />the comments made by representatives from the states are attached. <br /> <br />Draft Recovery Goals Issued: On September 10th the USFWS issued draft recovery goals to supplement <br />and amend recovery plans for four species of endangered fish of the Colorado River Basin. The goals are <br />supposed to identify site-specific management actions necessary to minimize or remove threats; establish <br />objective, measurable criteria that consider demographic and genetic needs for self-sustaining, viable <br />populations; and provide recovery time estimates. <br /> <br />Draft recovery goals will be mailed to interested persons upon request and are available at mountain- <br />vrairie. fws.f!ov/ea/in foouckets/colorudoriver. . <br /> <br />. Comments on the goals should be postmarked by October 24, 2001. A decision on the final goals will be <br />made three to six months after the comment period closes. Final goals win become part of the recovery plan <br />for each species. <br /> <br />Biologic Studies Proceeding on Gore Creek: Members ofthe Stream and Lake Protection Section met with <br />Sue Helm, aquatic biologist William Walsh, and Jay Skiuner of the Division of Wildlife on August 25, 2001 <br />to discuss preliminary results of a brown trout egg survival study being conducted on Gore Creek. Last <br />winter, Mr. Walsh initiated a study which he hopes will quantify the relationship between instream velocity <br />parameters at brown trout redds (egg nests) and over-winter survival of brown trout eggs. Preliminary <br />results indicate that velocities of 0.5 ft/sec to 1.1 ft/sec are optimum for over-winter survival of brown trout <br />eggs. Mr. Walsh plans to continue this study next winter over a wider range of Colorado streams. <br /> <br />Deep Creek Wilderness Discussions: At the urging of U.S. Rep. Scott McInnis, the Colorado River Water <br />Conservation District, the Sierra Club and others have been discussing the designation of an area near the <br />Flattops Wilderness Area as an additional federally protected wilderness area. <br /> <br />The area, known as Deep Creek, is described as being a dramatic canyon similar to the Black Canyon of the <br />Gunnison. Deep Creek emerges above Dotsero to join the Eagle River and eventually the Colorado River. <br /> <br />Although Deep Creek is indisputably beautiful, it is downstream from its headwaters within a national forest. <br />The CRWCD and the Divisiop of Wildlife are the major water rights holders, but several small ditches also <br />have upstream water rights. <br /> <br />McInnis has encouraged the parties to pay special attention to crafting language regarding water rights before <br />. making a wilderness recommendation. No consensus language has emerged from these discussions and early <br />versions of proposed language have not been acceptable to McInnis or the CRWCD. <br /> <br />A draft of the Deep Creek Wilderness water language is attached. <br /> <br /> <br />11 <br />