BOARD00991

• Board Meeting Date: 1/25/1995
• Description: Agenda or Table of Contents, Minutes, Memos
• Board Meetings - Doc Type: Meeting

V 8. InStream Flow Program - Statements of Opposition (9:45 - 10:00)
The Board will be aslred to ratify the statements of opposition which have. been filed by the staff t<a
protect instream flow water rights on the streams listed below. ..
d1().I~~ .
a. v Case No. 2-94CW041; Upper Arkansas River WCD (Cattn"'1'88d 0 uk)
w~ @v Case No. 2-94CW042; Upper Arkansas River WCD (euuu"..vot/ Creek) ~ CnJ
c. v Case No. 5-94CWI75; Davis-Cooney L.L.C. (Blue River)
d. l./ Case No. 5-94CWI91; Spruce Valley Ranch Foundation (Blue River)
e. v Case No. 5-94CW204; Goldsmith (Gypsum Creek)
f. / Case No. 5-94CW225; Eagle Pass Ranch (Blue River)
g. J Case No. 5-94CW245; Kravis (North Fork White River)
h. ./Case No. 7-94CW071; Lynd (Piedra River)

V9.

Instream Flow Program - Authorization to Withdraw (10:00 - 10:05)
The Board will be aslred to authorize staff to withdraw its opposition in the following cases.

a. Case No. 7-93CW088; Rowland (Rio Blanco River)

Break (10 minutes)

V 10.

Instream Flow Program - Authorization to Proceed to Trial (10:15 - 10:25)
The Board will be asked to authorize staff to proceed to trial in the following cases.
. .

a. Case No. 7-94CW029; McLellan (Florida River)
/} I. Instream Flow Program - Informational Items (10:25 - 12:00)

--

a.

Summary of Resolved Cases
Staff will advise the Board of settlements which have been reached to protect the Board's
instream flow rights on the streams listed below.

(1) Case No. 1-90CW220; Englewood (non instreamflow case - Bear Creek)
(2) Case No. 4-90CWI12; The Telluride Company (San Miguel River)
(3) Case No. 5-90CWOI4; Vail Valley Consolidated Water District (Gore Creek)
(4) Case No. 5-93CWI55; Pass Creek Ranch (Blue River)
(5) Case No. 6-93CW097; Seely (Williams Fork River)
(6) Case No. 7-93CW083; Mountain View Development Corp. (San Juan River)

/

/{ b. "De minimis" Cases
Staff will advise the Board of cases in which the staff applied the "De minimis" Rule and
did not file statements of opposition to protect instream flow rights.

(I) Case No. 1-94CWI67; Twelve Mile Fishing Club (Twelve Mile Creek)
(2) Case No. 4-94CWl77; Greenberg (Fall Creek)
(3) Case No. 5-94CW211; Colorado High Guides (Sweetwater Creek)
(4) Case No. 5-94CW223; Pole Creek Meadows (Crooked Creek)
(5) Case No. 5-94CW243; Creamery Gulch Land Company, Inc. (East Lake Creek)

tJ

2