My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00983
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD00983
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:56:31 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:47:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
4/13/1966
Description
Minutes and Resolution
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />MR. SPARKS: <br /> <br />MR. GEISSINGER: <br /> <br />MR. SPARRS: <br /> <br />MR. MOSES: <br /> <br />MR. SPARKS: <br /> <br />::>Utl.l <br /> <br />what would be the justification?" <br /> <br />"It's difficult to understand any justi- <br />fication on the basis of coordination, because <br />just last year the National Water Resources <br />Planning Act was passed which was for the <br />specific purpose of coordinating the various <br />federal agencies. A National Water Resources <br />Council was established pursuant to the act <br />of last year. It is a council consisting of <br />the Secretary of Army, Secretary of the Inter- <br />ior, Secretary of Agriculture, Federal Power <br />Commission, and one or two others. It was <br />established for the specific purpose of setting <br />up a coordinating agency in the federal govern- <br />ment itself to coordinate with the states and <br />with the local water councils that would be <br />established under the river basin concept. <br />So it is difficult to see why we have to have <br />another agency in view of the act which was <br />passed last year." <br /> <br />"Larry, let me ask you this with reference <br />to 4671, your statement here that there might <br />be an attempt to amend that in the Senate, do <br />you foresee any Senate hearings on 4671 this <br />session?" <br /> <br />"Very definitely yes." <br /> <br />"They've already had the major ones." <br /> <br />"They've already had the major hearings <br />but it appears that there will be hearings on <br />H.R. 4671. It's possible that they may foll~l <br />the same course that the House intends to <br />follow . <br /> <br />There will not be a new bill, as such, <br />introduced in the House. I neglecte~ to <br />mention that. The Committee on Interior and <br />Insular Affairs of the House is now preparing <br />a 'committee print' of H.R. 4671. This elimi- <br />nates the necessity for the introduction of <br />a new bill. It is possible that the Senate <br />may follow the same course." <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.