My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00970
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD00970
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2010 4:52:34 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:47:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
7/22/1993
Description
Agenda or Table of Contents, Minutes, Memos. Partial.
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
192
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />INSTREAM FLOW QUANTIFICATION - LITTLE DRY CREEK <br />April 5, 1993 <br />PAGE 7 <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />important to the species of fish utilized in the PHABSlM portion of the modeling. <br /> <br />The habitat suitability (HSl) curves that were used for the three species of fish described <br />above were obtained from the US Fish and Wildlife Service's Fort Collins, Colorado office, the <br />National Ecology Research Center. The HSI curves are depicted in Figure 2, 3, and 4. The <br />sources for these HSI curves are found in the references section of this report. HSI curves for <br />fathead minnows (adults only), creek chubs (adults and juveniles), and white suckers (spawning, <br />fry, juveniles, and adult life stages) were selected for use in this study. The following <br />discussion relies upon the PHABSlM results from these HSI curves. <br /> <br />IFIMIPHABSIM RESULTS <br /> <br />As stated above, two IFlM representative reach study sites were selected from the habitat <br />survey of the entire reach of Little Dry Creek throughout CGV and CRY. Transects were <br />selected to describe pools, runs, and riffles typical and representative of the Little Dry Creek <br />corridor. The CRY site had six cross sections and the CGV site had five cross sections. Field <br />measurements were collected per the IFlM methodology. The field information was assembled <br />into data files and the hydraulic calibration and simulation phases of the methodology was <br />completed without incident. The PHABSlM portion of the IFlM methodology was then <br />completed and the results analyzed by the DOW. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Since the flows in Little Dry Creek are fairly low and quite steady, habitat was simulated <br />at flows ranging from 0.5 to 5 cfs. This range of flows is typical for Little Dry Creek and is, <br />for the most part, within the accepted band of confidence for the hydraulic simulation. The <br />results of the PHABSlM analysis is displayed in Table 1 and Table 2 and Figure 5 and Figure <br />6. <br /> <br />e <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.