My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00962
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD00962
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:56:19 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:47:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
11/10/1953
Description
Minutes
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />261 <br /> <br />WATER CONSERVATION BOARD <br />MEETING <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Room 330, State Office <br />Building <br /> <br />Denver, Colorado <br />November 10, 1953 <br /> <br />1he Meeting was called to order by Mr. Bailey at <br />1:30 P.M. The Hill Report was distributed to all the <br />members. <br /> <br />Mr. Bailey explained that there had been a deve- <br />lopment with reference to the Colorado River Storage <br />Project that presented problems and he believed that <br />all had been furnished some information with reference <br />to this situation. He asked the Director to tell the <br />Board something about the problem. <br /> <br />Mr. Crawford told the Board that on October 13th <br />he left Denver to attend the National Reclamation <br />Association meeting tn Reno, Nevada, and that he was <br />joined enroute by ~r. Bennett of the Bureau of Re- <br />clamation. Mr. Bennett indicated that he would like <br />to talk about certain Colorado problems, one being <br />the Curecanti project. On re-examination of the <br />Colorado Hiver Storage Project, Bennett saId it was <br />found that Curecanti was economically unsound, from <br />the standpoint of power. Power could be developed <br />cheaper by coal than by water at that location. With <br />that information Mr. Crawford returned to Colorado, <br />notified the members of the Policy and Review Committee <br />and also the members of the Water Conservation Board, <br />sending them data which was given to him by the Bureau <br />of Reclamation. Mr. Riter, Mr. Huffman, from the Bureau <br />of Reclamation, Mr. Tipton, Mr. Gildersleeve and Mr. <br />Crawford met and went over these figures. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Mr. Bailey informed the Board that Mr. Riter and <br />Mr. Huffman were present to answer such questions as <br />might be asked. <br /> <br />Mr. Pughe asked Mr. Crawford if Curecanti could <br />produce hydro~power at 11 mills. <br /> <br />Mr. Crawford said yes, at the 940,000 acre-feet. <br />He was also told by Mr. Bennett that the large Curecanti <br />was right on the edge, but could be classed as economical. <br />The small Curecanti did not make as ~ood a showing. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.