My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00962
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD00962
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:56:19 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:47:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
11/10/1953
Description
Minutes
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />274 <br /> <br />projects to each individual project and each <br />unit thereof. This is not in keeping with <br />proven business practices. We might c;i te ex- <br />amples such as the retail grocery business; <br />such a business could not exist if a fixed per- <br />centage of profit had to be included in the <br />markup of the goods sold. It is common practice <br />to adjust the margin of profit many times between <br />several items and in some cases some items are <br />actually sold at a price below cost. But, the <br />overall operations of the business shows a profit <br />to the store.. In the case of the Upper Colorado <br />River Storage project, as originally presented <br />by the Bureau of Reclamation, water of the Gun- <br />nison river is at present over appropriated. <br />No further development can take place without <br />storage of water on the Gunnison river. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />POWER COSTS. We do not believe the comparison <br />of power costs at Curecanti with that of steam <br />thermo generation is a fair comparison_as the <br />wholesale cost of power in Delta and Montrose <br />and Gunnison is over 12 mills. And a recent <br />survey, by a prominent engineering firm of <br />Chicago, Illinois, on a 22,500 K.W steam plant <br />constructed at the mouth of a coal mine on a <br />non-profit basis, provides for a minimum aver- <br />age cost of 10.38 mills per k.w.h. Therefore, a <br />comparison of 10 mills per k.w.h. cost for Cure- <br />canti power against 9 mills for steam power is not <br />.an' accurate comparison. <br /> <br />COLORADO'S SHARE OF WATER. The Western Slope of <br />Colorado contributes over seventy percent of the <br />water that makes up the Colorado river and is en- <br />titled (by Compactl to consumptively use 51.75 <br />percent of the total amount of water allocated to <br />the upper basin states. Without storage and river <br />regulation the people of Colorado cannot use this <br />water. Curecanti reservoirs will allow the use of <br />765,000 acre-feet annually, and the only way Colo- <br />rado can make use of the water allocated to it is <br />to retain it before it flows out of the State. <br />Colorado's share of the river is lost to Colorado <br />after it flows out of the State. What benefit to <br />Colorado is water stored in Utah and Arizona? What <br />reason is there for compacts? Is it our sole re- <br />sponsibility to provide water for California? Do <br />we not have a responsibility to our own people? <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The greatest deposits of lead, zinc, silver in the <br />United States and many minerals in smaller quantities <br />such.as copper, gold, tungsten, manganese and others <br />are located a few miles south of the Gunnison river <br />in the San Juan Range. Sulphur, gilsonite, gipson <br />vermiculite and many other non-metallic minerals <br />abound in the Gunnison river <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.