My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00961
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD00961
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:56:18 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:47:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
9/22/2003
Description
Flood Section - Probable Maximum Precipitation Site-Specific Study for the Cherry Creek Reservoir-Study Findings and Recommendations
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
75
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />SECTI..FIVE <br /> <br />Alternatives for Improved Stormwater Management <br /> <br />. Alternative B - Municipalities takeover all drainage activities and the Orand Junction <br />Drainage District is abolished. <br />Alternatives including a unified, valley-wide organization: <br />. Alternative CI - New Drainage Authority based on legislation passed in 2001, <br />. Alternative C2 - Orand Junction Drainage District as an umbrella authority, <br />. Alternative C3 - Regional Service Authority (needs to contllin at least one entire county), <br />. Alternative C4 - Organization under Mesa County, and <br />. Alternative C5 - Intergovernmental Agreements (lOA's). <br />A summary comparison of the differentiating factors of the alternatives is presented in ,able 6. <br />Table 6 <br />Comparison of Unified V alley-Wide Alternatives <br /> <br /> Alternative <br /> Cl C3 <br /> Cl Grand Junction Regional C4 C5 <br />Comparison Item Drainage Drainage Service Mesa County IGA <br /> Authority District Authority (with Water (with Water <br /> (with Water (with Water Enterprise) <br /> Enterprise) Enterprise) (with Water Enterprise) <br /> Enterprise) <br /> Water Activity Water Activity Water Activity Water Activity Water Activity <br /> Enterprise Enterprise would Enterprise Enterprise could Enterprise <br /> would work work within would work only be applied would work <br /> well, could existing well to Mesa County well, could <br />Funding Issues include all boundaries, but Jurisdiction, not include all <br />entities if all area outside the other entities entities if all <br /> agree boundary would (Water Activity agree <br /> be an issue Enterprise is <br /> limited to one <br /> jurisdiction) <br /> Flexible, Does not Must contain Flexible, county Flexible, could <br />Initial Boundary contract currently include one or more could specify be defined in <br />between entities entire study area entire counties contract <br /> defmes <br /> boundary <br /> By contract Two ways: By addition of Flexible, County By contract <br /> amendment 1. Property an entire county could amend but amendment <br />Boundary agreed to by owners must be in the agreed to by <br />Expansion participating agreement County participating <br /> entities 2. New state entities <br /> legislation <br /> By contract All ready formed Election All ready By contract <br />Formation by: between all Formed between all <br /> oarticioants particioants <br /> By contract Existing 3 To be Elected Existing BOCC By contract <br />Board Makeup between all member elected between all <br /> participants board particioants <br /> <br />URS <br /> <br />T:\PROJECTS\22236022_GRAND_ VALLEYlSUB_OO\6.0_PROJ_DElIV\F1NAL REPORT\FINAL REPT REV 4.DOC\9-JUL_03\\ 5 - 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.