Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. ; <br /> <br />SECTIO.POUR <br /> <br />Problems and Needs <br /> <br />The Level of Service provided by the current system is presented in Table 5. "Level of Service" <br />for stormwater infrastructure is defined as the rainfall event that the system can accommodate <br />without significant hazards or problems. This table illustrates hazards and problems with the <br />Level of Service provided by the current system, in a generalized nature. Specific areas could be <br />more hazardous and other areas less hazardous. The technical staff, using their best professional <br />judgment and observations of recent flood events, developed this table. <br /> <br />Table 5 <br />Hazard Ratings for Current Level of Services <br /> <br />Type of Hazard/Problem Level of Service bv ~'Rainfall Event in Years,,(l) <br />1 vear 2 vear I 10 vear I 50 vear I 100 vear <br /> Relative De2ree of Hazard <br />Pedestrian Low Low Medium High High <br />Traffic Medium Medium High High Hi2h <br />Properly Dama ge Low Low Medium Hi2h Hi.h <br />Structure Damage Low Low Low Medium High <br /> <br />(1) Relation of "Rainfall Event in Years" to Percent Chance of Occurrence in One Year <br /> Rainfall Event in "Years" <br /> 1 I 2 I 10 I 50 I 100 <br />Chance of Occurrence in One Year 100%+/- I 50% I 10% I 2% I 1%+/- <br /> <br />It would be preferable to have a storm water system represented by a table with nothing but <br />"Low" values in every cell. However, that is prohibitively expensive, and stormwater managers <br />need to balance Level of Service with available funding. That is, an optimum level must be <br />determined. The optimum Level of Service and associated funding will be determined with <br />drainage basin planning studies that include cost/benefit analyses. <br /> <br />4.5 PHOTOGRAPHIC ILLUSTRA nON OF DRAINAGE PROBLEMS IN THE GRAND <br />VALLEY <br /> <br />The following photographs illustrate the need for maintenance, planning, and improved <br />infrastructure for drainage in the Grand Valley. These photographs were taken by managers <br />from the five entities, consultants, and individuals affected by flooding problems. <br /> <br />Figures 3 through 6 i\lustrate maintenance needs varying from simple (trash removal) to more <br />involved (utility relocation). Trash in a channel collects more trash and sediment and reduces the <br />flow capacity of the channel. There is a need for systematic inspection and cleaning. Figure 6 <br />illustrates overgrown vegetation as well as the potential problem of utility crossings. These <br />crossings can be a hindrance to flow, and there may be issues with uncertain responsibilities for <br />repairs or relocation. <br /> <br />Figures 7 through 13 illustrate flooding and other issues. <br /> <br />URS <br /> <br />T:\PROJECTS\22236022_GAAND_VALlEY\SUB_00\6.0_PROJ_DELJV\F1NAL REPORT\FINAL REPT REV 4.DOC\9-JUl-03\\ 4-4 <br />