Laserfiche WebLink
<br />SECTIO.THREE <br /> <br />Steering Committee Process <br /> <br />. Financial and Organizational Aspects of Alternatives, <br /> <br />. Legal Aspects of Alternatives, and <br /> <br />. Alternatives Analysis. <br /> <br />These documents provide a "road map" of the iterative process that led to the conclusions and <br />recommendations described below. <br /> <br /> <br />Jon Sorensen Discusses the Pros and Cons of a Drainage Authority <br />Steering Committee Meeting on May 22, 2003 <br /> <br />3.4 MEETINGS/PRESENT A nONS <br /> <br />The Steering Committee met monthly from December 2002 through June 2003 to view <br />presentations by the consultant team and to discuss the important issues facing the Grand Valley. <br />The stormwater managers of the five entities and the consultant team participated in additional <br />meetings before and after the Steering Committee meetings ("compression" and <br />"decompression" meetings), and the managers met separately to discuss and review each of the <br />Technical Memorandums. <br /> <br />3.5 CONSENSUS BUILDING FOR ALTERNATIVES <br /> <br />During the scoping process for the Steering Committee process, it was recognized that it would <br />be important for the Steering Committee to arrive at some level of consensus. The stormwater <br />managers asked facilitator Molly Tayer to devise a method in which a consensus might be <br />formed, given the process time constraints. Molly provided the Steering Committee with a <br />consensus discussion process with a fallback option to a meta-decision making rule. In essence, <br /> <br />URS <br /> <br />T:\PROJECTS\22236022_GRAND_VAllEY\SU8_00\6.0_PROJ_OEUWINAL REPORT\F1NAL REPT REV 4.DOC\9-JUl-03\\ 3-2 <br />