My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00961
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD00961
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:56:18 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:47:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
9/22/2003
Description
Flood Section - Probable Maximum Precipitation Site-Specific Study for the Cherry Creek Reservoir-Study Findings and Recommendations
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
75
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />,,' <br /> <br />Executive Summary <br /> <br />For over 100 years the Grand Valley has been developing at the bottom of 28 separate <br />drainage basins traversed by 6 major irrigation supply ditches (see basin map on following page). <br />The cities, towns, county, and irrigation and drainage districts responsible for drainage services <br />have not been able to keep pace with development in terms of providing adequate drainage and <br />flood control systems. The services <br />provided by the municipalities and districts <br />have been provided as an "as needed" <br />response to sudden problems. As a result, <br />the current drainage system is undersized, <br />has major gaps, and needs maintenance. <br />Because the system is inadequate, there are <br />many potential flood hazards to the <br />residents and property in the Valley. Based <br />on studies completed on 8 of the 28 <br />drainage basins, there are over $40 million <br />in capital proj ect needs in those 8 basins <br />that have been deferred. In addition, there <br />are needs for maintenance, planning, and <br />meeting the new federal regulations for File Photograph <br />storm water. <br /> <br /> <br />On March 10, 2003, Palisade, Mesa County, Grand Junction, the Grand Junction <br />Drainage District, and the Orchard Mesa Irrigation District submitted permit applications <br />as required by the Federal Clean Water Act. These entities will soon begin compliance with long <br />term permits to manage the quality and quantity of stormwateras required by the United States <br />Environmental Protection Agency and administered by the State of Colorado. This mandate <br />from the federal government is an un-funded mandate; local municipalities are required to fund <br />the implementation and maintenance of <br />the permits. Fines of up to $25,000 per <br />day are possible for not meeting the <br />requirements of the new federal <br />stormwater regulation. <br /> <br />The new federal standards precipitated <br />the collaboration of the municipalities and <br />districts to jointly address the issues of <br />the federal regulations and the associated <br />problems of an inadequate stormwater <br />system. <br /> <br /> <br />J <br /> <br />It is the responsibility of the <br />municipalities and districts to meet the <br />federal regulations and to plan, construct, <br />and maintain adequate drainage systems <br />as part of the services provided to the <br />community. Residential and commercial areas in all of the communities of the valley are <br />dependent on adequate drainage systems that function properly, <br /> <br />Flooding on 25 Road in Grand Junction <br />August 5, 1997 <br /> <br />...'iF <br /> <br />URS <br /> <br />T:\PROJECTS\22236022_GRAND_VALLEY\SUB_00\6.0_PRDJ_DELlV\FINAL REPORT\FINAL REPT REV 4.DOC\9-JUl.03\\ ES-l <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.