My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00961
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD00961
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:56:18 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:47:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
9/22/2003
Description
Flood Section - Probable Maximum Precipitation Site-Specific Study for the Cherry Creek Reservoir-Study Findings and Recommendations
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
75
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~E~T BY: USACE; <br />.. q.,"l .... <br /> <br />402 221 7184; <br /> <br />AUG-4-03 18:00; <br /> <br />PAGE 4/4 <br /> <br />, . ' <br /> <br />l <br /> <br />.2- <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Upon completion of the non-federal Cherry Creek PMP Technical Review by the ewcs <br />and local sponsors, what is the next step? During the open discussions at the June 19th <br />meeting, the committee members presented a number of requests/options for moving the <br />project forward. Please consider the following requests/options and reply to the eWCB. <br /> <br />Currently the proposed requests/options are: <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. REQUEST NO.1 - Can the Corps use the AWA PMP values and the Corps' 1995 PMF <br />model, the Corps will compute the PMF storage pool volume and compare the value to <br />the existing reservoir space and Corps' 1995 storage volume that presently has a <br />requirement for an additional 1 00,000 Acre-Foot of storage space to the existing <br />reselVoir pool? <br />· REQUEST NO.2 - Should the Corps not have the resources to perform REQUEST NO. <br />1. can the Corps provide its 1995 PMF Model to the eWCB so a non-federal PMF <br />volume determination can be computed using tile Corps procedures and AWA's PMP <br />input parameters? <br />. REQUEST NO.3-Is there an opportunity to revise the Corps' dam safety operational <br />requirements regarding storage and spill schedules for the Cherry Creek Dam and <br />Reservoir? <br />. REQUEST NO. 4- Should the Corps not have the resources to address REQUESTS 1- <br />3; Can the Corps partner with the eWCB and the NWS in a joint request to the National <br />Academy of Science for the resolution and determination of reasonable PMP values for <br />the Cherry Creek Basin using the findings in the NWS 1995 PM? Study and the AW A <br />2003 PMP Study? <br /> <br />The resolution of the proposed need for additional PMF storage issue for Cherry Creek Dam <br />and Reservoir in Denver. Colorado is important one to the State of Colorado, the sponsoring <br />communities and the Corps of Engineers. When the Corps has formulated a position and <br />response regarding this formal request, please provide me your cursory comments. Please also <br />provide approximate meeting dates so I can schedule a project review meeting with the <br />sponsoring communities working group called the Project Advisory Committee. I welcome the <br />Corps' involvement in the cwes technical revia:w of the Cherry Creek PMP and PMF Studies. <br />I await your response - Thank You! <br />/' <br />Sincere ...- <br />~i ~. <br /> <br />, arry"- ng/ ""7 <br />~roj~anager <br /> <br />.ce. <br /> <br />Sponsor Communities <br />Arapahoe County . <br />Douglas County <br />City of Aurora <br />City of Greenwood Village <br />Applied Weather Associates & Project file <br /> <br />Fwod Prolecbon . W3let Projec:c Planning and Fill4ncing. Sl1eam and Lak~ PrOICClwn <br />Wall:r Supply ProlCaion . Conservation Planning <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.