My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00949
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD00949
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:55:57 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:46:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
5/21/2001
Description
CWCB Director's Report
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />10E <br /> <br />The basic assumptions for the water availability study are: 1) assume additional storage volumes will <br />be used; 2) review the DWR current operations of the 10,000 acre-ft water supply pool; 3) review the <br />elevation 5432 @ 27,000 acre-ft nonnal pool and elevation 5424 @ 17,000 acre-ft operations; 4) <br />develop new demand curves for wet/dry year conditions; and, 5) evaluate storage pattern <br />opportunities based on environmental demands and controls. <br /> <br />The next project review meeting is scheduled for May 31 . <br /> <br />Cherry Dam Safety Study: A project review meeting was held on March 15. The project sponsors <br />welcomed the concept of a technical panel to review and comment on the study contractor's findings <br />and recommendations. The Board has contracted a three-member panel with technical expertise and <br />national recognition. The members are Nolan Doesken, CSU Colorado Climate Center; Lou <br />Schreiner, Chief Hydrologist, Bureau of Reclamation; and Gary Lewis, Parsons Engineering and <br />author of many textbooks on Dam Design Hydrology. <br /> <br />Greeley Flood Insurance Study: A contract with the Army Corps of Engineers has been execut~d <br />and work can begin on revisions to the Cache La Poudre River floodway analysis. The work is being <br />funded by a grant from the Federal Emergency Management Agency under its new program entitled <br />"Cooperating Technical Community" (CTC, now renamed CTP for "Cooperating Technical <br />Partnerships"). This arrangement is the first one of its kind in Colorado and staff is pleased with the <br />program thus far. <br /> <br />Rio Grande Basin Issues <br /> <br />Rio Grande Headwaters Restoration Project: This project, begun in 1999, is approaching its end. <br />On May 31 a meeting of the Technical Advisory Committee will be held where the consultant will <br />present recommendations that will be reviewed prior to a concluding meeting in June or July 2001. <br />At the concluding meeting, final technical recommendations will be presented and specific <br />administrative and financial recommendations for implementation will be discussed. The entities that <br />have been participating in the process, including local governments, will then detennine which <br />portions of the list of recommended actions they wish to pursue. <br /> <br />The 85-mile study reach, from just upstream of the Town of South Fork downstream to the Alamosa- <br />Conejos County line, has been divided into 7 reaches. The study reach was further divided into 30 <br />sub-reaches, averaging approximately 2.8 miles in length. The division into sub-reaches was based <br />on homogeneity of characteristics related to hydrology, floodplain width, river geomorphology and <br />vegetative conditions. The 30 sub-reaches were then analyzed with regard to specific river issues, as <br />called for in the Scope of Work. The issues examined were: river hydraulics, capacity and <br />floodplains; geomorphology; riparian habitat; diversion structures; and local plarming issues. <br /> <br />A numerical scoring system was developed to combine these separate analyses to arrive at overall <br />sub-reach scores and rankings. Using this infonnation, the results ofthe detailed field investigations, <br />and a comprehensive GIS analysis, the top problems were identified. <br /> <br />Starting upstream, some of the problems identified include: development in the floodplain; irrigation <br />diversions that were rated "poor"; bank instability; an old bridge that needs to be removed; railroad <br />bridges with hydraulic problems; poor sediment transport; flooding outside of flood protection levee; <br />and diversion that impedes flow. <br /> <br />It is expected that the consultant and the TAC will develop recommendations for alternative projects, <br />on a reach-by-reach basis; a list of twelve high priority construction projects; and a list of non- <br />structural measures that could be applied throughout the study area. <br /> <br />The T AC will invite local officials, property owners and other interested parties to the May 31 <br />meeting. <br /> <br />9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.