Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Floodplain Mapping Program: Flood Protection staff are investigating the feasibility and funding <br />to develop a statewide, comprehensive floodplain mapping program. In Colorado, many areas of the <br />state are using outdated maps and do not reflect current development, physical stream changes, roads <br />and bridges, and other man-made and natural features that have altered stream corridors. North <br />Carolina has a relatively new multi.million dollar mapping program that is being held as the <br />nationwide model for other states to follow. <br /> <br />Streamgaging Symposium: Along with the Division of Water Resources (DWR), the USGS, and <br />the Colorado Water Resources Research Institute, we co-sponsored a Streamgaging SymposiUlll on <br />May:.1 in Breckenridge. The symposium focused on major programs; the uses of streamflow data; <br />historic and current coverage of streamflow gages; and opportunities that may be available to <br />diversify and increase overall investments made to support the collection, dissemination, and <br />archiving of streamflow information. . <br /> <br />MEGA Board Meeting: The MEGA Board is meeting on May 14 in Breckenridge. I will update you <br />about its activities at your meeting. - <br /> <br />Education Initiative Update: A water education provider meeting was held on April 30 at the <br />Division of Wildlife. Thirty-three water education providers from a variety of arenas attended the <br />meeting. There were representatives from school districts, water utilities, Colorado Water <br />Conservation Board, universities and colleges, the now, the Colorado Department of Education I <br />wastewater districts, Ocean Journey, Project Learning Tree, Project Wet, Water's Ways, Colorado <br />Watershed Network, water conservation imd conservancy districts, BPA, Colorado Foundation for <br />Agriculture, and the USGS. <br /> <br />Ed Geary from CSU described a Digital Library for Earth Science Education that is in the <br />development process. Five hWldred exemplary water education projects will be identified through <br />standards and criteria. <br /> <br />Other participants gave short descriptions of water education projects that are currently occurring or <br />will be available next year. The data about water education projects is being collected to be put into a <br />database. Some of the water education programs target K-12 students and others address teachers <br />through workshops or summer institutes. There seemed to be a gap to address adult water education. <br />This sharing was very productive and gave participants an opportunity to network with each other <br />about sharing resources. <br /> <br />Based on feedback at the end of the meeting, the group saw a need for future meetings and more <br />coordination of water education efforts in Colorado. There is a need to get others involved in water <br />education to participate in future meetings and to make certain that all geographic areas of Colorado <br />are represented. Future meetings might include sharing best practices (e.g. addressing K-12 content <br />standards across various disciplines, strategies for professional development with teachers, exemplary <br />hands-on materials that develop concepts over a long period of time). <br /> <br />Information about the Colorado Science Convention to be held Oct. 4 - 5 in Denver at the <br />Merchandise Mart was also shared. Other water education provider meetings will be held this <br />summer or fall. Rita Crumpton, from the Ute Water Conservancy District will host a Grand Junction <br />meeting on June 14 and will follow a fonnat similar to the fonnat used in April. <br /> <br />No Adverse Impact Flood Policy: Arumal flood losses in the u.s. continue to grow despite 75 years <br />offederaI flood control and 30 years of the National Flood Insurance Program. <br /> <br />This trend is unnecessary and many feel is primarily due to federal policies that have encouraged at- <br />risk development. justify flood control projects that favor an intensification ofland uses within the <br />floodplain, and engendered an unhealthy reliance on federal resources by state and local <br />governments. <br /> <br />5 <br />