Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ ~ <br /> <br />Agenda item 20r <br />November 22-23,1999 Board Meeting <br />Page 2 00 <br /> <br />l\ <br /> <br />Purpose of Final Rule <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />The Final Rule establishes the procedural framework for the Secretary of Interior to <br />follow in considering, participating in, and administering "Storage and Interstate Release <br />Agreements" in the Lower Division States. These "Storage and Interstate Release <br />Agreements" are voluntary and permit State-authorized entities to; (I) store Colorado <br />River water offstream; (2) develop intentionally created unused apportionment (lCUA); <br />and (3) make ICUA available to the Secretary oflnterior for release and use in another <br />Lower Division State. The release ofICUA may only take place in accordance with <br />federal law in the year of storage or in years subsequent to storage. As important as what <br />the rule allows is what it specifically states it does not do allow. The rule does not: <br />. Affect any Colorado River water entitlement holder's right to use its full water <br />entitlement; <br />. Address or preclude independent actions by the Secretary regarding Tribal <br />storage and water transfer activities; <br />. Change or expand existing authorities under the body ofIaw known as <br />the "Law of the River"; <br />. Change the apportionments made for use within individual states; <br />. Address intrastate storage or intrastate distribution of water; <br />. Preclude a storing state storing some of its unused apportionment in another <br />Lower Division State consistent with applicable state law; or <br />. Authorize any specific activities. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Discussion <br /> <br />The Final Rule changed significantly from the Proposed Rule. The Final Rule is clearly <br />limited to the Lower Basin and less specific in details. However, the list of requirements <br />for developing "Storage and Interstate Release Agreement" is more lengthy and complete <br />as are the considerations imposed on the Secretary when executing an agreement. <br /> <br />I have reviewed Colorado's comment letter and find that our comments have been <br />adequately addressed, with the exception of comments we made regarding water quality <br />and possible impacts on Colorado River salinity and the Colorado River Salinity Control <br />Program. Since the Final Rule establishes only the procedural framework for the <br />Secretary oflnterior to follow in considering, participating in and administering "Storage <br />and Interstate Release Agreements" in the Lower Division States, it will be necessary for <br />the Secretary and Reclamation to do appropriate NEP A compliance for each individual <br />agreement. Furthermore, the Final Rule explicitly states that water quality is not <br />guaranteed. <br /> <br />The Final Rule sets forth 18 basic requirements for a "Storage and Interstate Release <br />Agreement." These requirements include a full description of the project and the <br />accounting and verification requirements that many others and we requested. The Final <br />Rule also sets forth a number of factors for the Secretary and Reclamation to consider <br /> <br />. <br />