Laserfiche WebLink
<br />It is also believed that this agreement will help Arizona utilize its full 2.8 million AF allocation of . <br />Colorado River Water, while the state gains an ally in its efforts to change the Central Arizona Project's <br />(CAP) junior water rights status. <br /> <br />Pat Mulroy, General Manager of the Southern Nevada Water Authority, told the CAP Board that Nevada <br />desperately needs the additional water because the drought has hit them harder than other states. "The <br />drought wiped out 15 years of water supply for Southern Nevada," she said. <br /> <br />Nevada had counted on being able to use excess water from the Colorado River while developing new <br />sources from within the state. Because of the drought, there is no excess water in the river. Mulroy <br />promised that if Arizona cities face a water reduction due to drought during the next two decades, while <br />the deal is in effect, Nevada will voluntarily take the same reduction in use. She also said CAP's junior <br />rights status makes no sense and needs to be revisited. <br /> <br />Price-Stubb Fish Passage: The Final Environmental Assessment and finding of no significant impact <br />have been received. Construction of the fish passage will begin in the fall of2005. Once completed, <br />endangered fish will have access to approximately 50-miles of additional critical habitat. In addition, <br />there may also be recreational boating uses if right-of-way issues with the railroad can be worked out, <br />which does not look very promising at this time. <br /> <br />DOW Reports Trout Declining in Blue River: In December 2004 the DOW told an Anglers Roundtable <br />that dwindling water releases from Dillon Reservoir are to blame for declines of up to 50 percent in trout <br />populations in the Blue River, a Gold Medal fishery. DOW Biologist Billy Atkinson estimated there are <br />1,150 brown trout (6 inches or larger) per mile in the Blue River just below the reservoir. Sampling <br />almost the same section in 2002, biologists estimated 1,763 per mile, and as recently as 2001, the agency <br />tallied 2,280 per mile. Atkinson said the latest numbers barely meet Gold Medal criteria, which specify 40 . <br />pounds offish per acre and 12 fish 14 inches or larger. Out of9,000 stream miles in Colorado, only 168 <br />miles qualify for the designation <br /> <br />The steep drop in trout numbers comes in spite of a series of habitat improvement projects begun in 2003 <br />aimed at creating deeper holes and channels, giving trout a place to hide and feed. The situation would <br />probably be worse without the habitat improvements in the Blue, said David Nickum, director of <br />Colorado Trout Unlimited. <br /> <br />EPA Comments ou Flaming Gorge EIS: On Dec. 17,2004 the EPA gave notice of the availability of its <br />comments on Reclamation's draft EIS on the Operation of Flaming Gorge Dam to Protect and Assist in <br />Recovery of Populations and Designated Critical Habitat of Four Endangered Fishes. In the summary of <br />its comments, EP A stated that the "Preferred Alternative may adversely affect other wildlife and their <br />habitats. EP A also expressed concerns over the uncertainties surrounding both the impacts of the <br />proposed management actions and the adaptive management changes that may be necessitated in the <br />future. In addition, EP A expressed concerns that only one alternative was evaluated besides the No <br />Action alternative, and suggested that other alternatives be evaluated" (see 69 Fed. Reg. 75536). <br /> <br />NRLC Conference Announced: The Natural Resources Law Center Annual June Water Conference will <br />be held June 8-10 and will be entitled: "Hard Times on the Colorado River: Drought, Growth and the <br />Future of the Compact." <br /> <br />Upper Colorado River Basin Recovery Implementation Program: Attached is a letter dated <br />December 29, 2004 that concludes the Recovery Program has maintained sufficient progress, but lists <br />seven areas of concern. The concerns are 1) declining population estimates, 2) effectiveness of nonnative . <br />fish management actions, 3) more detailed reporting on the operation of the GVIC fish passage and <br />screen, 4) low flow water supply issues associated with the Grand Valley Project fish passage operation, <br /> <br />26 <br />