My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00936
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD00936
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:55:47 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:46:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
1/25/2005
Description
CWCB Director's Report
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
222
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />2. The Supreme Court's ruling in December approved a formula that increased consmnptive use <br />projections. Kansas took no deliveries from its offset pool in John Martin Reservoir in 2003, <br />creating a 4,800 acre-foot shortfall. The pool was created in 1997 specifically to offset well <br />depletions. Witte said this nmnber could be contested since much of the water evaporated by <br />sitting in the pool. That would still leave Colorado 11,700 acre-feet short. <br /> <br />Witte was optimistic that Colorado broke even or came out ahead in 2004, and if precipitation in the next <br />two years is above or at average, there could even be a surplus by 2006. The state also will try to adjust <br />some of the data in the model, such as the amount of acreage irrigated by wells, the rate of consmnptive <br />use and weather conditions. <br /> <br />In the meantime, the state will attempt to make a "down payment" through augmentation plans - half of <br />the water in each of the two years remaining in the model. <br /> <br />Three major well users associations and smaller users within the valley have been notified ofthe problem. <br /> <br />It will be difficult for those water users to find supplemental native water to augment this year's well use. <br />Trades for transmountain water might be possible, but buying and applying transmountain water toward <br />the Kansas debt would bring action from West Slope water interests. <br /> <br />Witte informed water users that state drought grants up to $1 million are available and should be pursued <br />by the LA WCD. As a result, the Board voted to host a meeting with well owners' groups and to pursue a <br />state drought grant to help defray costs of obtaining water to make up the deficit. <br /> <br />Arkansas River Compact Administration: The Administration and its three committees met on Dec. <br />13-14, 2004 in Lamar for the Annual Meeting. Some progress was made on disputed accounting issues <br />and the Administration took a significant step in agreeing to seek advice from participating federal <br />agencies on the respective state positions on sorne of those issues. Procedures for utilizing the federal <br />expertise will first have to be developed. In addition, the Administration modified its budget to provide <br />funds for a potential study oftransit losses between John Martin Reservoir and the Stateline. Once <br />agreement is reached on the scope and methodologies for such a study, the Administration is prepared to <br />retain a consultant to conduct the investigation and develop accounting procedures to more accurately <br />determine water deliveries to downstream water users in Kansas and Colorado. <br /> <br />Water Bank: On Nov. 18, the Southeastern Colorado Water Activity Enterprise voted to discontinue <br />operation of the Pilot Arkansas River Water Bank. <br /> <br />Preferred Storage Options Plan (PSOP): The Southeastern Colorado Water Conservancy District <br />(SEWCD) has reported that federal legislation for both the PSOPS, completed after four years of work in <br />2000, and the Arkansas Valley Conduit failed to move during the lame duck session and will need to be <br />reintroduced. <br /> <br />In the meantime, the SEWCD intends to submit an application for permission from the federal <br />government to do a feasibility study to expand Pueblo and Turquoise reservoirs and to study the excess <br />capacity of the existing Fry-Ark proj ect storage. It is estimated that the study will take about 10 years to <br />complete. <br /> <br />The PSOP was to meet the need for additional water storage capacity to meet growing demands in <br />southeastern Colorado through the year 2040. Of the 40 alternatives that were studied, two are moving <br />forward as a part of the PSOP - utilitizing the existing excess capacity in the federal Fryingpan-Arkansas <br />Project and the enlargement of Pueblo and Turquoise Reservoirs. The size of the expansions will be <br />determined during the study. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.