Laserfiche WebLink
<br />only 1 % ranking it as a top issue in January 2002 to 18 percent in July 2002. . <br /> <br />"Thinking about Colorado issues, what would you say is the top issue you would like the governor and <br />state legislature to deal with in Colorado? Any other important issue?" <br /> <br />A copy ofthe entire survey is attached. You can also find a copy ofthe poll at www.ciruli.com. <br /> <br />Flood Hazard Mitigation Workshops: Mark Matulik and Joe Busto, along with Clancy Phillipsborn, a <br />hazard mitigation specialist, conducted four "Flood Hazard Mitigation" workshops from Aug. 19-22 for <br />local governments, consultants and floodplain managers. The workshops were held in Pueblo, Montrose, <br />Glenwood Springs and Greeley and 46 people attended. The workshop provided an overview of <br />Floodplain Management, state and federal mitigation issues and updates, funding and FEMA and State <br />directions in floodplain management. The afternoon qonsisted of hands-on exercises. Attendees were <br />given a scenario involving a heavy flood after forest fires in a town with 25 flood related problems on <br />three creeks. Attendees were asked to: prioritize the issues, deal with short term recovery, funding, <br />coordination and long term mitigation strategies. The scenarios clearly illustrated that a flood event or <br />disaster is not the time to create a plan to address these issues. Feedback from the scenarios and <br />workshops have been very positive. Handbooks and CDs of resources regarding the CWCB, FEMA and <br />flood planning and project funding were given to participants. <br /> <br />FEMA Map Modernization: We and the consultants hired to complete the Colorado Map <br />Modernization Implementation Plan (MMlP), Moser Engineering and PBS&J, are in the final weeks of <br />our plan preparation effort. The draft state plan is dueto FEMA on Aug. 30, with final plan preparation <br />to be completed on Sept. 15. The plan will describe the state's floodplain mapping priorities for all 332 <br />Colorado counties, cities and towns. The priorities will be organized according to counties (there are . <br />now 64 counties in Colorado with the creation of the City and County of Broomfield), since FEMA <br />expects that revised maps will be prepared on a countywide basis. <br /> <br />To date Congress remains supportive of President Bush's proposal for approximately $350 million <br />annually in FEMA floodplain mapping funds. It is not clear when such funding would be approved, but <br />current expectations are that money would not be available for actual map preparation before January <br />2003. Meanwhile, as the MMlP is finalized, we will coordinate with the highest ranked counties and <br />with the Urban Drainage & Flood Control District abi>ut possible upcoming floodplain mapping efforts. <br /> <br />Monitoring, Protection and Administration ofISFRights During the Drought: The extreme <br />drought that the West is experiencing has stream flows throughout Colorado at all time lows. Virtually <br />all of the state's river basins are under administrative 'calls from water rights with priority dates dating <br />back to the late 1800's. Due to their non-consumptive nature, the relatively junior instream flow water <br />rights held by the Board have benefited from these se~ior administrative calls that are generally located <br />at downstream points. <br /> <br />In an effort to ensure that its instream flow water rights are protected, we are engaged in a statewide <br />effort with the Division of Water Resources to review the various water court decrees which include <br />protective terms and conditions for our instream flow water rights to determine if water users are <br />operating in compliance with their decrees. If a water use is depleting an instream flow water right due <br />to out-of-compliance operation, the CWCB will ask the Division Engineers to initiate the necessary <br />action to bring the use into compliance. <br /> <br />Although the CWCB' s rights have relatively junior ~riority dates, many other water rights have been <br />appropriated since the CWCB's claims, and some senior claims have been voluntarily changed in water. <br />court, which necessitated terms and conditions to protect existing instream flow water rights from injury, <br />as provided under Colorado law. By enforcing decrees, the CWCB's instream flow rights will be fairly <br />and impartially protected within the state's water right priority system. <br /> <br />6 <br />