My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00845
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD00845
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:54:37 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:44:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
9/10/2002
Description
CWCB Director's Report
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />rafting are the top targets. Small or no reductions are recommended for most other water users, including . <br />farming, in-home, and recreational use such as fishing. <br /> <br />Water Rationing <br />No, Small and Large Water Reduction <br /> <br />Farminglranching <br />Restaurants <br />Fish ing <br />Businesslindustry <br />In-home use <br />Cities and town services <br />Rafting <br />Lawns <br />Golf courses <br /> <br />No <br />Reduction <br />56% <br />27% <br />24% <br />18% <br />17% <br />16% <br />14% <br />4% <br />3% <br /> <br />Small <br />Reduction <br />40% <br />65% <br />56% <br />69% <br />68% <br />60% <br />44% <br />38% <br />27% <br /> <br />i'Large <br />Reduction <br />2% <br />6% <br />15% <br />8% <br />14% <br />15% <br />34% <br />48% <br />49% <br /> <br />No <br />Water <br />1% <br />0.3% <br />2% <br />1% <br /> <br />2% <br />5% <br />10% <br />19% <br /> <br />.Ciruli Assqciates N601, July 2002 <br /> <br />Question: There are many users of Colorado water. If the qrought becomes even more serious and continues <br />for one or more years and water must be rationed, please tell me which items on the fOllowing list should have <br />no reduction in water supplies, have only a small reduction, a large reduction or receive little or no water: water <br />for Colorado agriculture and livestock; water for residents in-home use; water for seNices provided by cities . <br />and towns; water left in streams and rivers specifically for use in recreation activity such as rafting; water for <br />drinking and food preparation in restaurants and fast food facilities; water to operate business and industry; <br />water for lawns; water left in streams and rivers specifically for fishing; water for golf courses. <br /> <br />Building In Fire Danger Areas <br /> <br />Despite widespread fires and high fire danger, the <br />public still supports allowing new home building in <br />identified fire danger areas. The expense of <br />flrefighting, loss of property and, in some cases, <br />loss of life associated with forest fires has not <br />deterred Coloradans from continuing to favor a right <br />build new homes In the mountains, Only 35 percent <br />voters support a bUilding halt, whereas 57 percent <br />believe people should be allowed to build. The <br />North Front Range and Eastern Plains offer the <br />least support for continued building. <br /> <br />Question: There have been many forest fires in <br />recent years that have threatened or damaged <br />homes in mountain communities built in forested <br />areas. Do you believe people should be allowed to <br />build new homes in fire danger areas or not be <br />allowed to build new homes in fire danger areas? <br /> <br />Stop BuildIng in Fire Danger Areas <br /> <br />~S8% <br />Melro Aree . <br />38% <br /> <br />52% <br />Nor1h Front Range 41 % <br /> <br />to <br />of <br /> <br />'~ <br />: 85% <br />S<>U;lh Front Range 28% <br /> <br />__81% <br />i W..atern Slope 11111i111134% . <br /> <br />43% <br />51% <br /> <br />Eaelern Plelna <br /> <br /> <br />. Build <br /> <br />Not build <br /> <br />C""'VM$&o!'I~mOI.$(lp/\lmwml <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Observations and Conclusions <br />The survey provides evidence to support the following conclusions concerning Colorado voter public opinion. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.