Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Additional storage is supported by citizens from each of Colorado's five geographic regions. The North Front <br />Range (76%) and the Eastern Plains (75%) are most supportive, but no region is below 69 percent support. . <br />Republicans (70%) and unaffiliated (76%) voters most strongly support building storage projects. Sixty-seven <br />percent of Democrats agree more storage is needed. <br /> <br />Need Additional Storage Projects <br />Around the State and Among the Partie. <br />~tro a"la 69% <br /> <br />Republicans <br />'Oamocrals <br /> <br /> <br />700/. <br /> <br />N orlh FI'orlI Ran"" <br /> <br />Soulh Froot Ran9" <br /> <br />Eat<tarn P1alil$ <br /> <br />Vlulem SIOf'o <br /> <br />Una!fmatod <br /> <br />Need Additional Storage <br /> <br />CIM~,Il:tMt(:IM(j$;N$D~. 2'002 <br /> <br />Question: See question above <br /> <br />Paying for Billion Dollar Projects <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Cost estimates for building major water supply projects range from $1.5 billion to $10 billion. Voters were <br />asked if they would support a user fee of $2 per month on their water bill to pay for $2 billion In new water <br />project construction. They also were asked whether or not they would support a tenth of a cent sales tax <br />increase similar to taxes that helped fund Coors Field andlnvesco Field at Mile High. <br /> <br />User fees are substantially more popular than a sales tax; 69 percent of voters support a user fee vs, only 52 <br />percent who support a sales tax. The highest level of suppprt for user fees comes from the North Front Range <br />(76%), and the lowest from the Western Slope (60%). <br /> <br />Pay for $2 BIUlon Iln Water ProJectS: <br />User Fee or Sales Taxes <br /> <br /> <br />52% <br /> <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Usar iea Salll's Tax <br /> <br />. Support II Oppose . Don't Kllo'W <br />ClIilI11Ao,_,..N6I1r.JjJlY m2 <br />