My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00835
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD00835
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:54:28 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:44:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
1/27/1999
Description
CF Section - New Loans - Leroux Creek Water User Association - Carl Smith Dam Rehabilitation
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />" <br /> <br />Pro.iect Sponsor and Existin2 Facilities <br /> <br />-- <br /> <br />The Leroux Creek Water Users Association (LCWUA) is a non-profit corporation and a <br />mutual ditch company incorporated in 1948. There are about 5,800 shares of stock in the <br />association and 100 water users. Water is provided for the irrigation of about 5,000 acres <br />ofland on Redlands Mesa north of Hotchkiss. Included are about 1,000 acres of fruit <br />orchards as well as about 4,000 acres of feed crops and pasture land. In addition, two <br />municipal water providers, the town of Hotchkiss and the Rogers Mesa Domestic Water <br />Company, own shares in the Association. <br /> <br />The Company owns and operates all 28 of the reservoirs in the upper Leroux Creek basin, <br />which is tributary to the North Fork of the Gunnison River. Carl Smith reservoir is an off- <br />channel facility, which receives diversions from Leroux Creek. It is the lowest reservoir <br />in the Leroux Creek system and provides equalizing storage, The reservoir is therefore a <br />key component of the LCWUA system. <br /> <br />Water Ri2hts <br /> <br />Storage decrees for Carl Smith date back to 1963 with absolute decrees for about 718 <br />acre-feet and one conditional decree for 536 acre-feet. Storage records from 1970 to 1997 <br />indicate that the reservoir was filled to capacity (about 800 acre-feet) in 23 of the 27 a <br />years. _ <br /> <br />Alternatives Investi2ated <br /> <br />The Smith Geotechnical feasibility study analyzed four alternatives for the dam including <br />a pennanent dam breach, a smaller structure, restoration of the existing dam and a larger <br />dam, The costs of the alternatives are summarized in Table 1. <br /> <br />Table I. Summary of Alternatives <br /> <br /> <br />Permanent Breach <br />Reduce Dam Height . <br />Maintain Dam Height <br />Increase Dam Hei ht <br /> <br />!l. <br />o <br />375 <br />800 <br />1,600 <br /> <br />NA <br />$2,052 <br />$1,650 <br />$2,742 <br /> <br />Maintaining the existing dam height with 800 acre-feet of storage was the optimum <br />solution and the selected alternative. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.