Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />Water Conservation and Efficiency TRT <br />Subcommittee Work Products <br /> <br />Subcommittee I. . Next Steps "~~-~,?"-':,,,,,.:-:.~~-~~~.; <br />Question 4: . Plan to provide case studies on water providers <br />Challenges to . conservallon programs (Westminster case study already <br />Implemen!ation presented).ln addition, plan to discuss the political <br /> process surrounding the Metro Mayor's Caucus <br /> Conservation BMPs and the next steplhat group plans to <br /> lake as part of ils program. <br />Conservation and Have developed screening process to Identify areas in the <br />Efficiency . state where agricultural efficiencies could be considered. <br />Agricultural . Will use information developed In the Alternative <br />Question: Agricultural Transfers TRT to help address agricultural <br />Agricultural efflclencyquestions. <br />Measures <br />- - , ~ - <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />SWSI's Approach to Quantifying <br />Conservation <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Each IP&P contains a level of conservation <br />In current gap areas, it is possible to estimate a <br />range of demand reductions from conservation <br />Projecting conservation that can be used <br />between service areas is difficult <br /> <br />Alternative Agricultural Transfers TRT <br />Subcommittee Work Products <br /> <br />Subcommittee . Next Steps <br />Legal: Provide work product focusing on the implementability <br />Legislation/Water from a legal perspective of various allernalive agricultural <br />Court Processes transferoplions. <br />Financial: 1 Develop a description of the types of costs associated <br />Administrative with alternative agriculluraltransfer options <br />Costs, Economic (Administrative, Legal, Infrastructure, Engineering (transit <br />Impacts, loss calculations, conveyance, etc.]. Mainlenance <br />Compensation Resource costS) <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />